public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: RFC: A mode in which gdb avoids libthread_db
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 15:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030726155820.GA1063@nevyn.them.org> (raw)

Recent Linux kernels (2.5.30 and later; theoretically the latest Red Hat
2.4.20 kernels also include it, but I observed some badness in testing...)
support some ptrace extensions I designed which make it possible to debug
multi-threaded applications without using libthread_db at all.  The only
things we'll lose are:
  - Potential high-level information, like mutex status - right now we
    don't have this at all on GNU/Linux.
  - TLS access - this could be easily fixed by handling each platform's
    TLS ABI directly from GDB, and there's a comment to that effect in
    GDB's source already.
  - TIDs - we'd only have the application's LWP IDs, not the thread IDs
    that LinuxThreads/NPTL use.

Things we'll gain:
  - A lot of libthread_db-related bugs would go away.  For instance,
    the kfail in print-threads.exp, which hits a breakpoint after
    LinuxThreads decides the thread has already exited.
  - ABI simplicity - this would solve the x86-64/i386 issue, and similar
    problems on MIPS.
  - Support for debugging clone-based 1-1 threading which doesn't use
    libpthread.so.

Once the pending fork-debugging patch is accepted, most of the machinery
we'd need to do it will be in place, too.  Thoughts?  Worthwhile?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-26 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-26 15:58 Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-07-26 23:29 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-07-26 23:32   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-08  2:21     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-28 20:53 ` Kevin Buettner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030726155820.GA1063@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).