* On GNU/Linux, always use lin-lwp?
@ 2004-09-15 23:47 Andrew Cagney
2004-09-16 0:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-09-15 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
(I'm going to regret asking this)
As a design question, on GNU/Linux, should the code found in lin-lwp
always be active (i.e., not use infptrace at all).
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: On GNU/Linux, always use lin-lwp?
2004-09-15 23:47 On GNU/Linux, always use lin-lwp? Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-09-16 0:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-09-16 0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 07:45:27PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> (I'm going to regret asking this)
>
> As a design question, on GNU/Linux, should the code found in lin-lwp
> always be active (i.e., not use infptrace at all).
Yes, absolutely. I've wanted to do this for ages, and your posted
patch to allow native targets more cleanly reminded me of it.
[At this rate, who knows when I'll have time, though? Merging to
intercu branch now...]
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-16 0:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-15 23:47 On GNU/Linux, always use lin-lwp? Andrew Cagney
2004-09-16 0:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).