From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: macros, debug information, and parse_macro_definition
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EAE927E.4030005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304241512.h3OFCG518027@mailhub.lss.emc.com>
>
> These encodings are simple enough that I wouldn't expect them to
> change over time.
>
> I would think it more likely that there would be a bug, either in
> gcc's encoding of them or in gdb's processing of them. And if the
> code is duplicated, then both locations need to be modified to fix the
> bug -- with the attendant risk that someone will modify one and forget
> to modify the other. Or will modify it, but accidentally make it
> slightly different.
> I don't know how people would feel about having STABS have a
> description of the encoding combined with a caveat that the DWARF
> 2.0.0 spec is authoritative. I would certainly prefer that the STABS
> document remain self contained.
I think this is a good strategy. It's already a ``gcc extension'', and
stealing an existing (known to be working) spec is always a good
strategy :-)
Have you thought about link time information compression? One of the
complaints leveled at the macro stuff is the size of the resultant debug
info.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-29 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-22 16:40 David Taylor
2003-04-22 20:06 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-04-24 3:08 ` Jim Blandy
2003-04-24 15:12 ` David Taylor
2003-04-29 14:55 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-04-29 15:55 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-04-29 16:24 ` Keith Walker
2003-04-29 17:13 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-04-29 16:51 ` David Taylor
2003-05-02 19:21 ` Jim Blandy
2003-05-04 19:41 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EAE927E.4030005@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=dtaylor@emc.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).