* LSI 33k ?
@ 2003-05-06 12:34 Kevin Buettner
2003-05-06 18:27 ` Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Buettner @ 2003-05-06 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Does anyone know anything about the LSI 33k? Okay, more specifically, did
support for this core ever actually work in GDB?
In mips-tdep.c, I see the following:
/* Names of LSI 33k registers. */
char *mips_lsi33k_reg_names[] = {
"epc", "hi", "lo", "sr", "cause","badvaddr",
"dcic", "bpc", "bda", "", "", "", "", "",
"", "", "", "", "", "", "", "",
...
With the exception of IRIX, the first line for all of the other regname
sets look like this:
"sr", "lo", "hi", "bad", "cause","pc",
I'm not concerned about IRIX, because BADVADDR_REGNUM, CAUSE_REGNUM,
PC_REGNUM, etc. are redefined in the appropriate tm-*.h file.
The LSI 33k rearranges these registers, apparently even the PC_REGNUM
value, but nowhere do I see a PC_REGNUM definition that's specific to
the LSI 33k. This is bad because if the LSI 33k registers are really
laid out as indicated by lsi33_reg_names[], then there's no way that
GDB is actually obtaining the correct PC value whenever it uses PC_REGNUM.
(It'll be using the "baddvaddr" value...)
I thought for a while that perhaps the LSI 33k was simply bit-rotted,
but after doing some digging in the old Cygnus CVS repository, I don't
see how it could have ever worked.
Does anyone know?
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: LSI 33k ?
2003-05-06 12:34 LSI 33k ? Kevin Buettner
@ 2003-05-06 18:27 ` Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stan Shebs @ 2003-05-06 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Buettner; +Cc: gdb
It might never have worked, or the correct code might not be in CVS
anywhere.
I have a vague memory that it was for Array Technology ca 1992-3, and in
those
earlier days of Cygnus, some shipments were made "by hand", and not all
of the
customer's bits exactly corresponded with a CVS tag. remote-array.c
might also
have an answer in the form of jiggered-around register numbering.
Stan
Kevin Buettner wrote:
>Does anyone know anything about the LSI 33k? Okay, more specifically, did
>support for this core ever actually work in GDB?
>
>In mips-tdep.c, I see the following:
>
> /* Names of LSI 33k registers. */
>
> char *mips_lsi33k_reg_names[] = {
> "epc", "hi", "lo", "sr", "cause","badvaddr",
> "dcic", "bpc", "bda", "", "", "", "", "",
> "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "",
> ...
>
>With the exception of IRIX, the first line for all of the other regname
>sets look like this:
>
> "sr", "lo", "hi", "bad", "cause","pc",
>
>I'm not concerned about IRIX, because BADVADDR_REGNUM, CAUSE_REGNUM,
>PC_REGNUM, etc. are redefined in the appropriate tm-*.h file.
>
>The LSI 33k rearranges these registers, apparently even the PC_REGNUM
>value, but nowhere do I see a PC_REGNUM definition that's specific to
>the LSI 33k. This is bad because if the LSI 33k registers are really
>laid out as indicated by lsi33_reg_names[], then there's no way that
>GDB is actually obtaining the correct PC value whenever it uses PC_REGNUM.
>(It'll be using the "baddvaddr" value...)
>
>I thought for a while that perhaps the LSI 33k was simply bit-rotted,
>but after doing some digging in the old Cygnus CVS repository, I don't
>see how it could have ever worked.
>
>Does anyone know?
>
>Kevin
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-06 18:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-06 12:34 LSI 33k ? Kevin Buettner
2003-05-06 18:27 ` Stan Shebs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).