From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: The root cause for SEGV in evaluating fortran function call, any solution or suggestion?
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 02:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511021033530.3549@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508221743470.10411@linux.site>
Hi all,
I had found the reason why gdb will drop into SEGV when evaluating the
fortran function calls. In g77 (gfortran might be the same), when we try
to call FUNC_NAME (ARGS), the ARGS is passed as the pointer to the real
parameters.
While we issue "print FUNC_NAME (ARGS), these ARGS are passed as the
original types. So fortran code can't handle that and SEGV occurs.
Considering this special argument-passing mechanism, do we have any
workaround for it in gdb's evaluation code? Create a dummy memory address
for the arguments and pass that address instead? or any others?
Your comments are highly appreciated. Thanks a lot.
Regards
- Wu Zhou
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Wu Zhou wrote:
>
> I just found a problem while using gdb to debug fortran program: gdb will
> drop into SEGV error while trying to print the result of a function call.
> I had tried the same test on FC4, SLES9, FC2 and RH9, all reported the
> same error.
>
> Anyone has success experience with this? If you do, please tell me
> the configuration. Thanks a buch for that in advance!
>
> Maybe I need to try more ancient configuration?
>
> Regards
> - Wu Zhou
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-02 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-22 10:14 [GDB & Fortran] Anyone has success experience with printing the result of Fortran function calls? Wu Zhou
2005-11-02 2:39 ` Wu Zhou [this message]
2005-11-02 14:53 ` The root cause for SEGV in evaluating fortran function call, any solution or suggestion? Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-03 3:12 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-03 21:34 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-11-04 3:15 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-04 3:52 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-07 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-07 4:49 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-07 5:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-07 5:16 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-10 0:55 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-10 0:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-11 9:59 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-04 11:20 ` Dave Korn
2005-11-06 23:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-02 15:51 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-11-03 2:50 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-03 7:42 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-03 10:16 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-07 0:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-10 0:49 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-10 1:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0511021033530.3549@linux.site \
--to=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).