From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: The root cause for SEGV in evaluating fortran function call, any solution or suggestion?
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511071313380.30759@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051107050138.GA26181@nevyn.them.org>
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:51:59PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> > You are quite right. Following your pointer, I made another patch and it
> > now passed with both g77 (3.4.4) and gfortran (4.0.1) on a x86 box. I
> > didn't consider the red zone in AMD64 architecture, so maybe it won't work
> > on it. I will try to find a chance to test it on other platform, such as
> > ppc64 or any other platform I can get access to.
> >
> > Appended is the patch. Any comments and suggestion are highly
> > appreciated!
>
> Just to be clear: the patch is _not_ acceptable as is. We need to
> decide what gfortran's debugging information should look like, and how
> the transformation should be controlled by language. Casting an
> integer to a pointer by pushing it to the stack this way is not the
> correct behavior for any other language.
That is okay. I am very happy to know how gfortran should handle this
kind of case. Will you talk with gfortran guys on this? If possible,
would you please include me in the cc-list of your correspondence? That
will be highly appreciated.
Regards
- Wu Zhou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-07 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-22 10:14 [GDB & Fortran] Anyone has success experience with printing the result of Fortran function calls? Wu Zhou
2005-11-02 2:39 ` The root cause for SEGV in evaluating fortran function call, any solution or suggestion? Wu Zhou
2005-11-02 14:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-03 3:12 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-03 21:34 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-11-04 3:15 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-04 3:52 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-07 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-07 4:49 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-07 5:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-07 5:16 ` Wu Zhou [this message]
2005-11-10 0:55 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-10 0:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-11 9:59 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-04 11:20 ` Dave Korn
2005-11-06 23:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-02 15:51 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-11-03 2:50 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-03 7:42 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-03 10:16 ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-07 0:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-10 0:49 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-10 1:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0511071313380.30759@linux.site \
--to=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).