public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: The root cause for SEGV in evaluating fortran function call, any solution or suggestion?
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511071313380.30759@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051107050138.GA26181@nevyn.them.org>



On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:51:59PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> > You are quite right.  Following your pointer, I made another patch and it 
> > now passed with both g77 (3.4.4) and gfortran (4.0.1) on a x86 box.  I 
> > didn't consider the red zone in AMD64 architecture, so maybe it won't work 
> > on it.  I will try to find a chance to test it on other platform, such as 
> > ppc64 or any other platform I can get access to.
> > 
> > Appended is the patch.  Any comments and suggestion are highly 
> > appreciated!
> 
> Just to be clear: the patch is _not_ acceptable as is.  We need to
> decide what gfortran's debugging information should look like, and how
> the transformation should be controlled by language.  Casting an
> integer to a pointer by pushing it to the stack this way is not the
> correct behavior for any other language.

That is okay.  I am very happy to know how gfortran should handle this 
kind of case.  Will you talk with gfortran guys on this?  If possible, 
would you please include me in the cc-list of your correspondence?  That 
will be highly appreciated.
 
Regards
- Wu Zhou

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-07  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-22 10:14 [GDB & Fortran] Anyone has success experience with printing the result of Fortran function calls? Wu Zhou
2005-11-02  2:39 ` The root cause for SEGV in evaluating fortran function call, any solution or suggestion? Wu Zhou
2005-11-02 14:53   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-03  3:12     ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-03 21:34       ` Mark Kettenis
2005-11-04  3:15         ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-04  3:52           ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-07  0:09           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-07  4:49             ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-07  5:01               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-07  5:16                 ` Wu Zhou [this message]
2005-11-10  0:55             ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-10  0:59               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-11  9:59                 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-04 11:20         ` Dave Korn
2005-11-06 23:58           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-02 15:51   ` Mark Kettenis
2005-11-03  2:50     ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-03  7:42     ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-03 10:16       ` Wu Zhou
2005-11-07  0:02       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-10  0:49         ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-10  1:00           ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0511071313380.30759@linux.site \
    --to=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).