* How to get software recording to work? @ 2022-01-21 15:15 Simon Sobisch [not found] ` <DM8PR11MB5749520182B9D686E8254730DE5E9@DM8PR11MB5749.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Simon Sobisch @ 2022-01-21 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb (gdb) record full (gdb) continue Continuing. Process record does not support instruction 0xfae64 at address 0x7ffff7df0f48. Process record: failed to record execution log. Program stopped. 0x00007ffff7df0f48 in _dl_runtime_resolve_xsave () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 This is produced in an older environment with GDB 9.2; using a different environment with GDB 11.1: Process record does not support instruction 0xc5 at address 0x7ffff6c79024. Process record: failed to record execution log. Program stopped. 0x00007ffff6c79024 in __memset_avx2_unaligned_erms () from /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 Can this recording be done reliably? Which places would need to be fixed / adjusted to get this working? Thanks for any pointers, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <DM8PR11MB5749520182B9D686E8254730DE5E9@DM8PR11MB5749.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>]
[parent not found: <932be60f-b2d3-11fe-929c-4ad9d702be8c@gnu.org>]
* RE: How to get software recording to work? [not found] ` <932be60f-b2d3-11fe-929c-4ad9d702be8c@gnu.org> @ 2022-01-24 9:27 ` Metzger, Markus T 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Metzger, Markus T @ 2022-01-24 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Sobisch; +Cc: gdb Hello Simon, >Thanks Markus for your answers (just in case: they weren't CC'ed to the >mailing list, not sure if this was by intent). It was not. My email client sometimes removes mailing lists when I 'reply all' and I forgot to re-add it. Thanks for pointing it out. >> The issue is lack of AVX support in the record full instruction decoder. >> >>> Can this recording be done reliably? Which places would need to be fixed >>> / adjusted to get this working? >> >> AFAIK record full also has issues with multi-threaded processes. To fix the >instruction decode issue, the best approach IMHO would be to extend the >instruction decoder that is used for disassembly and use that for record full. > >Is this something Intel may have a look at? > >I guess Instruction/Processor specific instructions are possibly best >implemented by the vendors, aren't them? Intel is maintaining the binutils disassembler. It is a bit unfortunate that record full uses a separate instruction decoder. Given the issues with multi-threaded debuggee processes, I'm not sure how usable record full would be. Or how much it would be used if we were to enable AVX. I remember it adding significant recording overhead. Regards, Markus. Intel Deutschland GmbH Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de <http://www.intel.de> Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Sharon Heck, Tiffany Doon Silva Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau Registered Office: Munich Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-24 9:27 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-01-21 15:15 How to get software recording to work? Simon Sobisch [not found] ` <DM8PR11MB5749520182B9D686E8254730DE5E9@DM8PR11MB5749.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> [not found] ` <932be60f-b2d3-11fe-929c-4ad9d702be8c@gnu.org> 2022-01-24 9:27 ` Metzger, Markus T
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).