public inbox for glibc-bugs-regex@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug regex/1221] New: remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES
@ 2005-08-20 7:32 eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-20 7:32 ` [Bug regex/1221] " eggert at gnu dot org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-20 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
Once the patch for bug 1220 is installed, the regex code uses function
prototypes for all internal functions, so there's no longer any reason
for RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES. Please see the attached patch.
--
Summary: remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES
Product: glibc
Version: 2.3.5
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: regex
AssignedTo: gotom at debian dot or dot jp
ReportedBy: eggert at gnu dot org
CC: glibc-bugs-regex at sources dot redhat dot com,glibc-
bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
BugsThisDependsOn: 1220
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug regex/1221] remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES
2005-08-20 7:32 [Bug regex/1221] New: remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES eggert at gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-20 7:32 ` eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-26 21:42 ` eggert at gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-20 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
------- Additional Comments From eggert at gnu dot org 2005-08-20 07:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=598)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=598&action=view)
remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug regex/1221] remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES
2005-08-20 7:32 [Bug regex/1221] New: remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-20 7:32 ` [Bug regex/1221] " eggert at gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-26 21:42 ` eggert at gnu dot org
2005-09-06 18:11 ` drepper at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-26 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |1248
nThis| |
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug regex/1221] remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES
2005-08-20 7:32 [Bug regex/1221] New: remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-20 7:32 ` [Bug regex/1221] " eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-26 21:42 ` eggert at gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-06 18:11 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2005-10-15 20:59 ` drepper at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2005-09-06 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
--
Bug 1221 depends on bug 1220, which changed state.
Bug 1220 Summary: regex uses old-style definitions that cause g++ to fail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug regex/1221] remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES
2005-08-20 7:32 [Bug regex/1221] New: remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES eggert at gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-06 18:11 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2005-10-15 20:59 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-04-19 17:43 ` bruno at clisp dot org
2006-04-25 18:01 ` drepper at redhat dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2005-10-15 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-10-15 20:59 -------
I applied someting like this patch.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug regex/1221] remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES
2005-08-20 7:32 [Bug regex/1221] New: remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES eggert at gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-15 20:59 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2006-04-19 17:43 ` bruno at clisp dot org
2006-04-25 18:01 ` drepper at redhat dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bruno at clisp dot org @ 2006-04-19 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
--
Bug 1221 depends on bug 1220, which changed state.
Bug 1220 Summary: regex uses old-style definitions that cause g++ to fail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug regex/1221] remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES
2005-08-20 7:32 [Bug regex/1221] New: remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES eggert at gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-19 17:43 ` bruno at clisp dot org
@ 2006-04-25 18:01 ` drepper at redhat dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2006-04-25 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
--
Bug 1221 depends on bug 1220, which changed state.
Bug 1220 Summary: regex uses old-style definitions that cause g++ to fail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-25 18:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-20 7:32 [Bug regex/1221] New: remove RE_NO_INTERNAL_PROTOTYPES eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-20 7:32 ` [Bug regex/1221] " eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-26 21:42 ` eggert at gnu dot org
2005-09-06 18:11 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2005-10-15 20:59 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-04-19 17:43 ` bruno at clisp dot org
2006-04-25 18:01 ` drepper at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).