public inbox for glibc-bugs-regex@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug regex/1224] New: unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c
@ 2005-08-21  0:25 eggert at gnu dot org
  2005-08-21  0:26 ` [Bug regex/1224] " eggert at gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-21  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs-regex

This is just a minor cleanup to remove declarations in posix/regcomp.c
that are no longer needed once function prototypes are used consistently.

-- 
           Summary: unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.3.5
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: regex
        AssignedTo: gotom at debian dot or dot jp
        ReportedBy: eggert at gnu dot org
                CC: glibc-bugs-regex at sources dot redhat dot com,glibc-
                    bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
 BugsThisDependsOn: 1220


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1224

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug regex/1224] unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c
  2005-08-21  0:25 [Bug regex/1224] New: unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c eggert at gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-21  0:26 ` eggert at gnu dot org
  2005-09-06 18:10 ` drepper at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-21  0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs-regex


------- Additional Comments From eggert at gnu dot org  2005-08-21 00:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=602)
 --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=602&action=view)
Remove unnecessary forward decls.


-- 


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1224

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug regex/1224] unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c
  2005-08-21  0:25 [Bug regex/1224] New: unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c eggert at gnu dot org
  2005-08-21  0:26 ` [Bug regex/1224] " eggert at gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-06 18:10 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  2005-10-15 21:14 ` drepper at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2005-09-06 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs-regex



-- 
Bug 1224 depends on bug 1220, which changed state.

Bug 1220 Summary: regex uses old-style definitions that cause g++ to fail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1224

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug regex/1224] unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c
  2005-08-21  0:25 [Bug regex/1224] New: unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c eggert at gnu dot org
  2005-08-21  0:26 ` [Bug regex/1224] " eggert at gnu dot org
  2005-09-06 18:10 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2005-10-15 21:14 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  2006-04-19 17:43 ` bruno at clisp dot org
  2006-04-25 18:01 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2005-10-15 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs-regex


------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com  2005-10-15 21:14 -------
The patch isn't quite correct.  I kept one of the prototypes.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1224

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug regex/1224] unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c
  2005-08-21  0:25 [Bug regex/1224] New: unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c eggert at gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-10-15 21:14 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2006-04-19 17:43 ` bruno at clisp dot org
  2006-04-25 18:01 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bruno at clisp dot org @ 2006-04-19 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs-regex



-- 
Bug 1224 depends on bug 1220, which changed state.

Bug 1220 Summary: regex uses old-style definitions that cause g++ to fail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1224

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug regex/1224] unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c
  2005-08-21  0:25 [Bug regex/1224] New: unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c eggert at gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-04-19 17:43 ` bruno at clisp dot org
@ 2006-04-25 18:01 ` drepper at redhat dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2006-04-25 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs-regex



-- 
Bug 1224 depends on bug 1220, which changed state.

Bug 1220 Summary: regex uses old-style definitions that cause g++ to fail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1224

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-25 18:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-21  0:25 [Bug regex/1224] New: unnecessary forward decls in posix/regcomp.c eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-21  0:26 ` [Bug regex/1224] " eggert at gnu dot org
2005-09-06 18:10 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2005-10-15 21:14 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-04-19 17:43 ` bruno at clisp dot org
2006-04-25 18:01 ` drepper at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).