public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/10103] Targets defining __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH should still have *l prototypes in headers.
       [not found] <bug-10103-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-11-04 14:25 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-06-30  9:18 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2011-11-04 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10103

Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2011-11-04 14:25:09 UTC ---
Fixed in master.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/10103] Targets defining __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH should still have *l prototypes in headers.
       [not found] <bug-10103-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-11-04 14:25 ` [Bug libc/10103] Targets defining __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH should still have *l prototypes in headers schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-06-30  9:18 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-30  9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10103

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |security-

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/10103] Targets defining __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH should still have *l prototypes in headers.
  2009-04-24 20:30 [Bug libc/10103] New: " carlos at codesourcery dot com
  2009-04-24 20:32 ` [Bug libc/10103] " carlos at codesourcery dot com
  2009-04-24 20:36 ` jakub at redhat dot com
@ 2009-04-27 17:01 ` carlos at codesourcery dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: carlos at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-27 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 792 bytes --]


------- Additional Comments From carlos at codesourcery dot com  2009-04-27 17:01 -------
I tested the following patch on hppa:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2009-04/msg00004.html

No regressions. However, I don't see the long double prototypes.

The port sets __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH set to 1, and I verified this.
The build sets NO_LONG_DOUBLE to 1 because the port sets long-double-fcts = no.

Compiling test-ldouble.c with -Werror fails because of the missing prototypes.
math/libm-test.c:5446: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘scalbl’
math/libm-test.c: In function ‘scalbn_test’:

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10103

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/10103] Targets defining __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH should still have *l prototypes in headers.
  2009-04-24 20:30 [Bug libc/10103] New: " carlos at codesourcery dot com
  2009-04-24 20:32 ` [Bug libc/10103] " carlos at codesourcery dot com
@ 2009-04-24 20:36 ` jakub at redhat dot com
  2009-04-27 17:01 ` carlos at codesourcery dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at redhat dot com @ 2009-04-24 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com  2009-04-24 20:36 -------
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2009-04/msg00004.html

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10103

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/10103] Targets defining __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH should still have *l prototypes in headers.
  2009-04-24 20:30 [Bug libc/10103] New: " carlos at codesourcery dot com
@ 2009-04-24 20:32 ` carlos at codesourcery dot com
  2009-04-24 20:36 ` jakub at redhat dot com
  2009-04-27 17:01 ` carlos at codesourcery dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: carlos at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-24 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From carlos at codesourcery dot com  2009-04-24 20:32 -------
Carlos O'Donell has verified that this path works for HPPA here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491#c25

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10103

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-30  9:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-10103-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2011-11-04 14:25 ` [Bug libc/10103] Targets defining __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH should still have *l prototypes in headers schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-06-30  9:18 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2009-04-24 20:30 [Bug libc/10103] New: " carlos at codesourcery dot com
2009-04-24 20:32 ` [Bug libc/10103] " carlos at codesourcery dot com
2009-04-24 20:36 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2009-04-27 17:01 ` carlos at codesourcery dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).