public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/10847] getutmpx is missing in libc.so.6
[not found] <bug-10847-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-07-01 5:33 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-07-01 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10847
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10847] getutmpx is missing in libc.so.6
2009-10-26 16:05 [Bug libc/10847] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-10-26 17:26 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-10-29 15:33 ` drepper at redhat dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2009-10-29 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2009-10-29 15:33 -------
I fixed this in git but not with the patch attached here.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10847
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10847] getutmpx is missing in libc.so.6
2009-10-26 16:05 [Bug libc/10847] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-10-26 16:21 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-10-26 17:26 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-29 15:33 ` drepper at redhat dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-10-26 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-10-26 17:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=4321)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4321&action=view)
New patch
Please find a new patch attached.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #4320 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10847
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10847] getutmpx is missing in libc.so.6
2009-10-26 16:05 [Bug libc/10847] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-26 16:06 ` [Bug libc/10847] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-26 16:17 ` jakub at redhat dot com
@ 2009-10-26 16:21 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-26 17:26 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-29 15:33 ` drepper at redhat dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-10-26 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-10-26 16:21 -------
I didn't though about this possibility, I'll try this option and send a new patch
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10847
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10847] getutmpx is missing in libc.so.6
2009-10-26 16:05 [Bug libc/10847] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-26 16:06 ` [Bug libc/10847] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-10-26 16:17 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2009-10-26 16:21 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at redhat dot com @ 2009-10-26 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2009-10-26 16:17 -------
What are the advantages of duplicating the code?
IMHO just add strong_alias (__getutmp, __getutmpx); after the include, and
possibly s/weak_alias/strong_alias/ also in the s390-32/getutmp.c.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10847
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10847] getutmpx is missing in libc.so.6
2009-10-26 16:05 [Bug libc/10847] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-10-26 16:06 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-26 16:17 ` jakub at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-10-26 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-10-26 16:06 -------
Created an attachment (id=4320)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4320&action=view)
Patch to fix the problem
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10847
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-01 5:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-10847-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2014-07-01 5:33 ` [Bug libc/10847] getutmpx is missing in libc.so.6 fweimer at redhat dot com
2009-10-26 16:05 [Bug libc/10847] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-26 16:06 ` [Bug libc/10847] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-26 16:17 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2009-10-26 16:21 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-26 17:26 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-10-29 15:33 ` drepper at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).