public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/12949] New: broken rpc implementation in glibc version 2.14
@ 2011-06-29 18:40 guido at trentalancia dot com
2011-06-29 19:47 ` [Bug libc/12949] " guido at trentalancia dot com
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: guido at trentalancia dot com @ 2011-06-29 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12949
Summary: broken rpc implementation in glibc version 2.14
Product: glibc
Version: 2.14
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
AssignedTo: drepper.fsp@gmail.com
ReportedBy: guido@trentalancia.com
It seems that the rpc implementation shipped with libc version 2.14 is broken.
For example, apparently it does not install header files in /usr/include/rpc
and thus it breaks the build of other packages such as libtirpc or at least it
leads to a libtirpc which is missing symbols for DES encryption (so that
libtirpc is basically unusable).
See also:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha/16260
https://bugs.gentoo.org/370663?id=370663
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/12949] broken rpc implementation in glibc version 2.14
2011-06-29 18:40 [Bug libc/12949] New: broken rpc implementation in glibc version 2.14 guido at trentalancia dot com
@ 2011-06-29 19:47 ` guido at trentalancia dot com
2011-06-29 21:45 ` guido at trentalancia dot com
2014-06-27 13:00 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: guido at trentalancia dot com @ 2011-06-29 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12949
Guido Trentalancia <guido at trentalancia dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Guido Trentalancia <guido at trentalancia dot com> 2011-06-29 19:47:11 UTC ---
It seems that this is intentional (see NEWS), so I am closing this.
Unfortunately, libtirpc is not ready yet to replace the functionality being
removed from glibc:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3311049&group_id=183075&atid=903784
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/12949] broken rpc implementation in glibc version 2.14
2011-06-29 18:40 [Bug libc/12949] New: broken rpc implementation in glibc version 2.14 guido at trentalancia dot com
2011-06-29 19:47 ` [Bug libc/12949] " guido at trentalancia dot com
@ 2011-06-29 21:45 ` guido at trentalancia dot com
2014-06-27 13:00 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: guido at trentalancia dot com @ 2011-06-29 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12949
--- Comment #2 from Guido Trentalancia <guido at trentalancia dot com> 2011-06-29 21:45:40 UTC ---
Unfortunately, at least the following packages are affected by the removal of
RPC support from glibc:
- Linux-PAM (unless --disable-nis is used)
- nfs-utils (because libtirpc is missing symbols for DES authentication and
perhaps a few more related to networking)
- yp-tools (same as above)
- ypbind-mt (same as above)
All the above packages are from kernel.org.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/12949] broken rpc implementation in glibc version 2.14
2011-06-29 18:40 [Bug libc/12949] New: broken rpc implementation in glibc version 2.14 guido at trentalancia dot com
2011-06-29 19:47 ` [Bug libc/12949] " guido at trentalancia dot com
2011-06-29 21:45 ` guido at trentalancia dot com
@ 2014-06-27 13:00 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-27 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12949
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
Flags| |security-
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
Fixed in glibc 2.16 by providing the --enable-obsolete-rpc configure option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-27 13:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-29 18:40 [Bug libc/12949] New: broken rpc implementation in glibc version 2.14 guido at trentalancia dot com
2011-06-29 19:47 ` [Bug libc/12949] " guido at trentalancia dot com
2011-06-29 21:45 ` guido at trentalancia dot com
2014-06-27 13:00 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).