public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug math/14469] New: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64
@ 2012-08-15 14:07 liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
2012-08-15 14:25 ` [Bug math/14469] " liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com @ 2012-08-15 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14469
Bug #: 14469
Summary: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64
Product: glibc
Version: 2.17
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: math
AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: liubov.dmitrieva@gmail.com
Classification: Unclassified
Test case example:
// gcc main.c -std=c99 -lm <-m32>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fenv.h>
#include <stdlib.h> // abs function for int argument
extern float j0f(float);
extern double j0(double);
#define i32(a) (((int*)&(a))[0])
int main() {
float a,r1,r2;
i32(a)=0x413caa1f; //argument
fesetround(FE_TONEAREST);
r1 = j0f(a); //actual result
r2 = j0(a); //actual result 2
printf("inputs: a = (0x%08x)\t%e\n", i32(a), a);
printf("actual = (0x%08x)\t%.13e\n", i32(r1), r1);
printf("expected = (0x%08x)\t%.13e\n", i32(r2), r2);
printf("error = %d ulp\n", abs(i32(r1) - i32(r2)));
return 0;
}
Results x86_32:
inputs: a = (0x413caa1f) 1.179153e+01
actual = (0xb471e828) -2.2529331999976e-07
expected = (0xb471d452) -2.2522115727952e-07
error = 5078 ulp
Results x86_64:
inputs: a = (0x413caa1f) 1.179153e+01
actual = (0xb471d9d6) -2.2524122300638e-07
expected = (0xb471d452) -2.2522115727952e-07
error = 1412 ulp
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64
2012-08-15 14:07 [Bug math/14469] New: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64 liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
@ 2012-08-15 14:25 ` liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
2012-08-15 15:11 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com @ 2012-08-15 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14469
--- Comment #1 from Liubov Dmitrieva <liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com> 2012-08-15 14:24:41 UTC ---
*** Bug 14468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64
2012-08-15 14:07 [Bug math/14469] New: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64 liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
2012-08-15 14:25 ` [Bug math/14469] " liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
@ 2012-08-15 15:11 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2012-08-16 8:06 ` liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2012-08-15 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14469
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2012-08-15 15:11:00 UTC ---
For reference for anyone working on improving accuracy for Bessel
functions (an issue for all the versions for all floating-point formats,
not just x86 / x86_64): http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jrh13/papers/bessel.ps.gz
discusses how to achieve correct rounding for Bessel functions of any
fixed constant order (jn/yn will be harder).
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64
2012-08-15 14:07 [Bug math/14469] New: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64 liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
2012-08-15 14:25 ` [Bug math/14469] " liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
2012-08-15 15:11 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2012-08-16 8:06 ` liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
2014-02-06 18:31 ` [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com @ 2012-08-16 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14469
--- Comment #3 from Liubov Dmitrieva <liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com> 2012-08-16 08:06:33 UTC ---
>> please give testcases that use hex floats
New test case for J0f Bessel function.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <fenv.h>
extern float j0f(float);
extern double j0(double);
int main() {
float a,r1;
double r2;
a=0x1.79543ep3; //argument
fesetround(FE_TONEAREST);
r1 = j0f(a); //actual result
r2 = j0(a); //actual result 2
printf("inputs: a = %.6a\n", a);
printf("actual = %.6a\n", r1);
printf("expected = %.6a\n", r2);
printf("error = %f ulp\n", fabs(r1 - r2) * exp2(23.0-logbf(r1)));
return 0;
}
64 bit result:
inputs: a = 0x1.79543ep+3
actual = -0x1.e3b3acp-23
expected = -0x1.e3a8a3p-23
error = 1412.411834 ulp
32 bit result:
inputs: a = 0x1.79543ep+3
actual = -0x1.e3d050p-23
expected = -0x1.e3a8a3p-23
error = 5078.411826 ulp
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function
2012-08-15 14:07 [Bug math/14469] New: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64 liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-16 8:06 ` liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
@ 2014-02-06 18:31 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-17 18:39 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-06 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14469
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Inaccurate j0f function on |Inaccurate j0f function
|x86_32 and x86_64 |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function
2012-08-15 14:07 [Bug math/14469] New: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64 liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-06 18:31 ` [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-17 18:39 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-08-06 10:44 ` zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr
2021-04-02 4:19 ` zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-17 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14469
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function
2012-08-15 14:07 [Bug math/14469] New: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64 liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-17 18:39 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2020-08-06 10:44 ` zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr
2021-04-02 4:19 ` zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr @ 2020-08-06 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14469
--- Comment #11 from Paul Zimmermann <zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr> ---
with glibc-2.32, the maximum error is now 6177902 ulps on x86_64 (for
x=3.153646966e+38)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function
2012-08-15 14:07 [Bug math/14469] New: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64 liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-08-06 10:44 ` zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr
@ 2021-04-02 4:19 ` zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr @ 2021-04-02 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14469
Paul Zimmermann <zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |2.34
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Paul Zimmermann <zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr> ---
fixed by commit 9acda61
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-02 4:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-15 14:07 [Bug math/14469] New: Inaccurate j0f function on x86_32 and x86_64 liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
2012-08-15 14:25 ` [Bug math/14469] " liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
2012-08-15 15:11 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2012-08-16 8:06 ` liubov.dmitrieva at gmail dot com
2014-02-06 18:31 ` [Bug math/14469] Inaccurate j0f function jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-17 18:39 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-08-06 10:44 ` zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr
2021-04-02 4:19 ` zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).