public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/15756] New: Check ABI for completeness
@ 2013-07-19 14:01 schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-07-19 20:19 ` [Bug libc/15756] " joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2013-07-19 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15756
Bug ID: 15756
Summary: Check ABI for completeness
Product: glibc
Version: 2.18
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: schwab@linux-m68k.org
CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
There should be a check that an architecture has all the expected interfaces in
its abilist files, to avoid repeating the mistakes with fallocate64 in 2.10
(missing for all 32-bit archtectures) or mcount in 2.17 (missing for aarch64).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/15756] Check ABI for completeness
2013-07-19 14:01 [Bug libc/15756] New: Check ABI for completeness schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2013-07-19 20:19 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-06-13 13:23 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-08-27 22:16 ` [Bug build/15756] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2013-07-19 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15756
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
Such a tools may well be useful to find existing problems and for checking
new architectures (with testing, overlapping tests for similar things can
often be useful), but as I said in
<http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-07/msg00380.html> I think this
is mainly an API issue not an ABI one.
Taking bug 15666 (alpha __sqrt*_finite) as an example, the real bug isn't
the missing symbols, it's that calling certain functions in code built
with -ffinite-math-only would have resulted in undefined symbols. And
it's not a bug that IA64 doesn't have those symbols, instead having its
own bits/math-finite.h that avoids needing them. Nor is it a bug that
architectures where long double functions are aliases for double functions
don't have *l_finite at all - bits/math-finite.h ensures the right
functions get used in that case. If anything, it's an ABI mistake that
IA64 *does* have the *_finite symbols for Bessel functions (since it gets
those functions from generic libm), even though its bits/math-finite.h
won't use them. (Since those are part of the public ABI now, the only
sensible fix would be to make IA64 bits/math-finite.h use those functions
rather than completely disabling *_finite.)
For all of those architecture variations that aren't bugs, a test that
verifies calling functions with -ffinite-math-only works would work
smoothly in the presence of such variations without needing any special
cases, while detecting the actual bug on alpha before it was fixed, but a
test based on comparing ABI lists would need special cases or manual
architecture maintainer review to determine that the differences are OK.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/15756] Check ABI for completeness
2013-07-19 14:01 [Bug libc/15756] New: Check ABI for completeness schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-07-19 20:19 ` [Bug libc/15756] " joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2014-06-13 13:23 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-08-27 22:16 ` [Bug build/15756] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-13 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15756
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15756] Check ABI for completeness
2013-07-19 14:01 [Bug libc/15756] New: Check ABI for completeness schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-07-19 20:19 ` [Bug libc/15756] " joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-06-13 13:23 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2015-08-27 22:16 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-27 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15756
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |carlos at redhat dot com
Component|libc |build
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-27 22:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-19 14:01 [Bug libc/15756] New: Check ABI for completeness schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-07-19 20:19 ` [Bug libc/15756] " joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-06-13 13:23 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-08-27 22:16 ` [Bug build/15756] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).