public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug build/17248] New: gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS @ 2014-08-09 20:25 pageexec at gmail dot com 2014-08-09 20:41 ` [Bug build/17248] " schwab@linux-m68k.org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pageexec at gmail dot com @ 2014-08-09 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17248 Bug ID: 17248 Summary: gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS Product: glibc Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: build Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: pageexec at gmail dot com CC: carlos at redhat dot com since glibc's Makeconfig calls $(sort) on CFLAGS, it is not possible to pass "-fplugin=... -fplugin-arg-..." in there as sort will reverse their order and gcc doesn't accept that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/17248] gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS 2014-08-09 20:25 [Bug build/17248] New: gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS pageexec at gmail dot com @ 2014-08-09 20:41 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2014-08-09 21:03 ` pageexec at gmail dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-08-09 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17248 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> --- That looks like a bug in gcc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/17248] gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS 2014-08-09 20:25 [Bug build/17248] New: gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS pageexec at gmail dot com 2014-08-09 20:41 ` [Bug build/17248] " schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-08-09 21:03 ` pageexec at gmail dot com 2014-08-19 18:09 ` carlos at redhat dot com 2015-08-02 17:14 ` pageexec at gmail dot com 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pageexec at gmail dot com @ 2014-08-09 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17248 --- Comment #2 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> --- well, it's arguably a feature since fplugin-arg-... encodes the plugin name that it applies to (i guess someone didn't want to do lazy plugin argument processing for some reason). in any case, using sort does more than just eliminate duplicates and it's a ticking bomb regardless of how -fplugin-* is handled (just imagine what happens to "-fstack-protector -fno-stack-protector" that can easily come from a build system and sorting them would undo the user's intention). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/17248] gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS 2014-08-09 20:25 [Bug build/17248] New: gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS pageexec at gmail dot com 2014-08-09 20:41 ` [Bug build/17248] " schwab@linux-m68k.org 2014-08-09 21:03 ` pageexec at gmail dot com @ 2014-08-19 18:09 ` carlos at redhat dot com 2015-08-02 17:14 ` pageexec at gmail dot com 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: carlos at redhat dot com @ 2014-08-19 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17248 --- Comment #3 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> --- This is not a gcc bug, this is a glibc problem, we shouldn't be sorting CFLAGS for internal use. It's not what developers expect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/17248] gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS 2014-08-09 20:25 [Bug build/17248] New: gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS pageexec at gmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2014-08-19 18:09 ` carlos at redhat dot com @ 2015-08-02 17:14 ` pageexec at gmail dot com 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pageexec at gmail dot com @ 2015-08-02 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17248 --- Comment #4 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> --- is there any agreement/progress on this issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-02 17:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-08-09 20:25 [Bug build/17248] New: gcc plugins cannot be passed arguments in CFLAGS pageexec at gmail dot com 2014-08-09 20:41 ` [Bug build/17248] " schwab@linux-m68k.org 2014-08-09 21:03 ` pageexec at gmail dot com 2014-08-19 18:09 ` carlos at redhat dot com 2015-08-02 17:14 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).