public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c
@ 2020-10-26 16:04 max at maxfragg dot de
2020-11-11 10:32 ` [Bug libc/26791] " arjun.is at lostca dot se
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: max at maxfragg dot de @ 2020-10-26 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791
Bug ID: 26791
Summary: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c
Product: glibc
Version: 2.34
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: libc
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: max at maxfragg dot de
CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
if sysconf is used in multithreaded processes, various filedescriptors may leak
due to missing O_CLOEXEC. Bug present in current head and at least all recent
glibc-versions.
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c
b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c
index 7958a74..783938a 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ __sysconf (int name)
if (procfname != NULL)
{
- int fd = __open_nocancel (procfname, O_RDONLY);
+ int fd = __open_nocancel (procfname, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC);
if (fd != -1)
{
/* This is more than enough, the file contains a single integer. */
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/26791] Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c
2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de
@ 2020-11-11 10:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
2020-11-11 12:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791
Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC| |arjun.is at lostca dot se
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |arjun.is at lostca dot se
Last reconfirmed| |2020-11-11
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> ---
I'll apply, test and commit this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/26791] Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c
2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de
2020-11-11 10:32 ` [Bug libc/26791] " arjun.is at lostca dot se
@ 2020-11-11 12:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
2020-11-11 12:33 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
2020-11-11 12:37 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791
Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> ---
Fixed:
commit d2d714b9fc02e4710d6dc769d8ec2c9dab0eb69a
Author: Maximilian Krüger <max@maxfragg.de>
Date: Wed Nov 11 11:21:30 2020 +0100
Use O_CLOEXEC in sysconf [BZ #26791]
If sysconf is used in multithreaded processes, various filedescriptors
may leak due to missing O_CLOEXEC. This commit adds the flag.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/26791] Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c
2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de
2020-11-11 10:32 ` [Bug libc/26791] " arjun.is at lostca dot se
2020-11-11 12:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
@ 2020-11-11 12:33 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
2020-11-11 12:37 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791
--- Comment #3 from Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> ---
Thanks for the report and patch!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/26791] Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c
2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-11 12:33 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
@ 2020-11-11 12:37 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791
Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |2.33
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-11 12:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de
2020-11-11 10:32 ` [Bug libc/26791] " arjun.is at lostca dot se
2020-11-11 12:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
2020-11-11 12:33 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
2020-11-11 12:37 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).