public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug glob/27522] New: glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as _THROW
@ 2021-03-05 10:59 fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-03-05 11:00 ` [Bug glob/27522] " fweimer at redhat dot com
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2021-03-05 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27522
Bug ID: 27522
Summary: glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as _THROW
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: glob
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: fweimer at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Flags: security-
glob and glob64 are marked as _THROW, which implies they are leaf functions.
Due to the use of callbacks, that is not actually true, so they should be
declared with _THROWNL.
This results in a failure of posix/tst-glob_lstat_compat once the test is no
longer marked as internal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug glob/27522] glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as _THROW
2021-03-05 10:59 [Bug glob/27522] New: glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as _THROW fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2021-03-05 11:00 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-03-05 11:02 ` [Bug glob/27522] glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as __THROW fweimer at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2021-03-05 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27522
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |fweimer at redhat dot com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug glob/27522] glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as __THROW
2021-03-05 10:59 [Bug glob/27522] New: glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as _THROW fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-03-05 11:00 ` [Bug glob/27522] " fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2021-03-05 11:02 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-03-05 13:09 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-11-22 8:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2021-03-05 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27522
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|glob, glob64 incorrectly |glob, glob64 incorrectly
|marked as _THROW |marked as __THROW
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug glob/27522] glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as __THROW
2021-03-05 10:59 [Bug glob/27522] New: glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as _THROW fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-03-05 11:00 ` [Bug glob/27522] " fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-03-05 11:02 ` [Bug glob/27522] glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as __THROW fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2021-03-05 13:09 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-11-22 8:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2021-03-05 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27522
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |2.34
--- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
Fixed for glibc 2.34 via:
commit 3c667926673bac6017bf78569f582f6baee9948f
Author: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Mar 5 12:02:20 2021 +0100
posix: glob, glob64 should not be declared __THROW [BZ #27522]
These functions invoke callbacks with GLOB_ALTDIRFUNC, so they
are not leaf functions (as implied by _THROW). Use __THROWNL
and __REDIRECT_NTHNL to express this.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug glob/27522] glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as __THROW
2021-03-05 10:59 [Bug glob/27522] New: glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as _THROW fweimer at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-05 13:09 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2021-11-22 8:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-22 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27522
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 28611 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-22 8:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-05 10:59 [Bug glob/27522] New: glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as _THROW fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-03-05 11:00 ` [Bug glob/27522] " fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-03-05 11:02 ` [Bug glob/27522] glob, glob64 incorrectly marked as __THROW fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-03-05 13:09 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-11-22 8:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).