public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug math/28472] pow(10, i) accuracy
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:36:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-28472-131-jT0yRX6jN5@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-28472-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28472

--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
I don't consider special-casing 10 in pow to be reasonable.  Integrating 
better function implementations from CORE-MATH would be reasonable, but 
it's important there to take account of portability considerations not 
handled in the CORE-MATH code (glibc supports 32-bit platforms, platforms 
without all the exception macros defined, platforms where there may be 
excess precision for intermediate computations, platforms where various 
__builtin_* functions used in CORE-MATH will be expanded out-of-line and 
slow, etc., and has various ABI and namespace considerations not covered 
in the CORE-MATH code as well, so significant work would be needed to turn 
such an implementation into something suitable for glibc).  Note that for 
any such new function implementatations, having suitable benchmark inputs 
in glibc's benchmarks is important first, to demonstrate that a new 
implementation is at least as fast as well as more accurate.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-09 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-18 23:54 [Bug math/28472] New: " mwelinder at gmail dot com
2021-10-19 15:44 ` [Bug math/28472] " joseph at codesourcery dot com
2021-10-19 21:28 ` mwelinder at gmail dot com
2021-10-19 21:42 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2021-10-25  8:44 ` newbie-02 at gmx dot de
2021-11-14  5:38 ` newbie-02 at gmx dot de
2022-01-24 21:45 ` mwelinder at gmail dot com
2022-01-24 21:56 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-09-23 16:33 ` newbie-02 at gmx dot de
2023-01-09 14:43 ` newbie-02 at gmx dot de
2023-01-09 18:35 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2023-01-09 21:23 ` newbie-02 at gmx dot de
2023-01-09 21:36 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2023-01-10  0:23 ` newbie-02 at gmx dot de
2024-03-02 22:53 ` vincent-srcware at vinc17 dot net
2024-03-04 14:58 ` wdijkstr at arm dot com
2024-03-04 15:35 ` vincent-srcware at vinc17 dot net
2024-03-04 16:07 ` wdijkstr at arm dot com
2024-03-04 17:09 ` vincent-srcware at vinc17 dot net
2024-03-04 18:27 ` wdijkstr at arm dot com
2024-03-04 19:23 ` vincent-srcware at vinc17 dot net
2024-03-18 21:09 ` newbie-02 at gmx dot de
2024-03-18 22:17 ` wdijkstr at arm dot com
2024-03-20  9:02 ` newbie-02 at gmx dot de
2024-03-20  9:56 ` vincent-srcware at vinc17 dot net
2024-03-20 13:54 ` wdijkstr at arm dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-28472-131-jT0yRX6jN5@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).