* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-12-13 17:43 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-13 17:43 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-12-13 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |deller at gmx dot de
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-13 17:43 ` [Bug libc/29899] " glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-12-13 17:43 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-13 19:52 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-12-13 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mattst88 at gmail dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-13 17:43 ` [Bug libc/29899] " glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-13 17:43 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-12-13 19:52 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-12-13 20:38 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2022-12-13 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2022-12-13
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
What are values of SIGSTKSZ and MINSIGSTKSZ before and after the commit?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-13 19:52 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2022-12-13 20:38 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-13 21:12 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-12-13 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> What are values of SIGSTKSZ and MINSIGSTKSZ before and after the commit?
I'm not sure how to read out those values as I tried it with small test program
which crashes after the commit.
Without commit, I get:
(sid-alpha-sbuild)glaubitz@z6:~/glibc-git/build$ /bz20305
The value of SIGSTKSZ is 16384.
The value of MINSIGSTKSZ is 4096.
(sid-alpha-sbuild)glaubitz@z6:~/glibc-git/build$
I used the following test program:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
int main() {
printf("The value of SIGSTKSZ is %d.\n", SIGSTKSZ);
printf("The value of MINSIGSTKSZ is %d.\n", MINSIGSTKSZ);
return 0;
}
Do you have any other suggestion for dumping the values?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-13 20:38 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-12-13 21:12 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-12-13 21:22 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2022-12-13 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > What are values of SIGSTKSZ and MINSIGSTKSZ before and after the commit?
>
> I'm not sure how to read out those values as I tried it with small test
> program which crashes after the commit.
>
> Without commit, I get:
>
> (sid-alpha-sbuild)glaubitz@z6:~/glibc-git/build$ /bz20305
> The value of SIGSTKSZ is 16384.
> The value of MINSIGSTKSZ is 4096.
> (sid-alpha-sbuild)glaubitz@z6:~/glibc-git/build$
>
> I used the following test program:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <signal.h>
>
> int main() {
>
> printf("The value of SIGSTKSZ is %d.\n", SIGSTKSZ);
> printf("The value of MINSIGSTKSZ is %d.\n", MINSIGSTKSZ);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> Do you have any other suggestion for dumping the values?
Why does this program crash with the commit?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-13 21:12 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2022-12-13 21:22 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-14 7:45 ` sam at gentoo dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-12-13 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> Why does this program crash with the commit?
That's what I am trying to find out. I suspect that the values of MINSIGSTKSZ
and SIGSTKSZ are not the cause of the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-13 21:22 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-12-14 7:45 ` sam at gentoo dot org
2022-12-14 7:53 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: sam at gentoo dot org @ 2022-12-14 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-14 7:45 ` sam at gentoo dot org
@ 2022-12-14 7:53 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-14 16:00 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-12-14 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
This is the minimum change directly on top the commit that fixes the problem
for me:
diff --git a/elf/dl-sysdep.c b/elf/dl-sysdep.c
index bd5066fe3b..bc45a6e9d3 100644
--- a/elf/dl-sysdep.c
+++ b/elf/dl-sysdep.c
@@ -115,10 +115,10 @@ _dl_sysdep_start (void **start_argptr,
user_entry = (ElfW(Addr)) ENTRY_POINT;
GLRO(dl_platform) = NULL; /* Default to nothing known about the platform.
*/
- /* NB: Default to a constant CONSTANT_MINSIGSTKSZ. */
- _Static_assert (__builtin_constant_p (CONSTANT_MINSIGSTKSZ),
- "CONSTANT_MINSIGSTKSZ is constant");
- GLRO(dl_minsigstacksize) = CONSTANT_MINSIGSTKSZ;
+ /* /\* NB: Default to a constant CONSTANT_MINSIGSTKSZ. *\/ */
+ /* _Static_assert (__builtin_constant_p (CONSTANT_MINSIGSTKSZ), */
+ /* "CONSTANT_MINSIGSTKSZ is constant"); */
+ /* GLRO(dl_minsigstacksize) = CONSTANT_MINSIGSTKSZ; */
for (av = GLRO(dl_auxv); av->a_type != AT_NULL; set_seen (av++))
switch (av->a_type)
@@ -184,9 +184,9 @@ _dl_sysdep_start (void **start_argptr,
case AT_RANDOM:
_dl_random = (void *) av->a_un.a_val;
break;
- case AT_MINSIGSTKSZ:
- GLRO(dl_minsigstacksize) = av->a_un.a_val;
- break;
+ /* case AT_MINSIGSTKSZ: */
+ /* GLRO(dl_minsigstacksize) = av->a_un.a_val; */
+ /* break; */
DL_PLATFORM_AUXV
}
diff --git a/sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h b/sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h
index 9720a4e446..9ead714718 100644
--- a/sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h
+++ b/sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h
@@ -536,8 +536,8 @@ struct rtld_global_ro
/* Cached value of `getpagesize ()'. */
EXTERN size_t _dl_pagesize;
- /* Cached value of `sysconf (_SC_MINSIGSTKSZ)'. */
- EXTERN size_t _dl_minsigstacksize;
+ /* /\* Cached value of `sysconf (_SC_MINSIGSTKSZ)'. *\/ */
+ /* EXTERN size_t _dl_minsigstacksize; */
/* Do we read from ld.so.cache? */
EXTERN int _dl_inhibit_cache;
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c
b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c
index 366fcef01e..5a5c89f80e 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c
@@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ __sysconf (int name)
}
break;
- case _SC_MINSIGSTKSZ:
- assert (GLRO(dl_minsigstacksize) != 0);
- return GLRO(dl_minsigstacksize);
+ /* case _SC_MINSIGSTKSZ: */
+ /* assert (GLRO(dl_minsigstacksize) != 0); */
+ /* return GLRO(dl_minsigstacksize); */
- case _SC_SIGSTKSZ:
- return sysconf_sigstksz ();
+ /* case _SC_SIGSTKSZ: */
+ /* return sysconf_sigstksz (); */
default:
break;
So, my suspicion is that adding the variable _dl_minsigstacksize to struct
rtld_global_ro {} breaks the ABI on Alpha.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-14 7:53 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-12-14 16:00 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-12-21 10:25 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-30 14:35 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2022-12-14 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5)
> So, my suspicion is that adding the variable _dl_minsigstacksize to struct
> rtld_global_ro {} breaks the ABI on Alpha.
rtld_global_ro is private to glibc. Are there any hardcoded rtld_global_ro
related values on Alpha?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-14 16:00 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2022-12-21 10:25 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-12-30 14:35 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-12-21 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
--- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
It seems that this issue has been fixed in version 2.36 but there is another
issue which so far I have failed to bisect:
(sid-alpha-sbuild)glaubitz@nofan:~/glibc-git/build$
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/glaubitz/glibc-git/build /bin/bash
Floating point exception
(sid-alpha-sbuild)glaubitz@nofan:~/glibc-git/build$
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/29899] Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu
2022-12-13 17:43 [Bug libc/29899] New: Fix for bz#20305 broke glibc on alpha-linux-gnu glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-21 10:25 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-12-30 14:35 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-12-30 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29899
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
After discussing this issue with Adhemveral, it turns out that my testing
method was incorrect and the segfault was a result of mixing ld.so and libc.so
from different glibc builds which, of course, doesn't work.
Closing this issue although the original problem may still exist. It affects
statically linked programs only, however.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread