public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "stsp at users dot sourceforge.net" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/30007] rfe: dlopen to specified address
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:47:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-30007-131-HTcXkhjKVC@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-30007-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30007

--- Comment #18 from Stas Sergeev <stsp at users dot sourceforge.net> ---
(In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #16)
> I am not even sure why the first segment
> should be at the beginning, does it
> always have the vaddr==0? But so do the
> comments in the present code suggest.

Actually it doesn't suggest that and
all segments are over-mapped over the
initial mapping. I'll need to re-check
my changes to _dl_map_segment() to see
if I got the things right.
But given that all segments are over-mapped,
certainly there is no reason to trap
the first mmap call.
Of course now I have some very bad feeling
that your next proposal will be "trap
all mmaps, not just the first one"...
Well, before you do that, consider the
following:
1. Some mappings are converted from
   file-based to anonymous via mprotect+memset.
2. _dl_map_segment() handles the "large
   alignment" case with 2 mmaps. The first
   large one is done only for alignment, and
   should I share with VM also that?
3. Do you really think that trapping all
   mmaps and trying to hack around the
   aforementioned problems, is a good idea?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-19  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-16 14:13 [Bug dynamic-link/30007] New: rfe: dlopen to user buffer or " stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-01-17 14:17 ` [Bug dynamic-link/30007] " adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-01-17 14:35 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-01-19 13:23 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-01-19 13:46 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-01-20  6:55 ` [Bug dynamic-link/30007] rfe: dlopen " stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-02-15 16:58 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-14  3:20 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-14 13:21 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-03-15  5:34 ` janderson at rice dot edu
2023-03-15  6:33 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-15 10:03 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-15 11:05 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-15 11:41 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-15 12:07 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-17  6:44 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-18 23:28 ` janderson at rice dot edu
2023-03-19  2:12 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-19  2:37 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-19  9:47 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net [this message]
2023-03-19 10:14 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-19 13:56 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-23 10:34 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-27  7:12 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-27 17:16 ` janderson at rice dot edu
2023-03-28  1:29 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-28  5:02 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-28  5:37 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-28  6:17 ` janderson at rice dot edu
2023-03-28  9:14 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-29 15:26 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-31 15:43 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-31 15:53 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-31 16:08 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-04-03  9:28 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-04-03  9:28 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-04-14 19:09 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-04-14 19:11 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-04-14 19:12 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-05-08 14:51 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-30007-131-HTcXkhjKVC@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).