public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "stsp at users dot sourceforge.net" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/30007] rfe: dlopen to specified address
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:41:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-30007-131-KfViTSZ9Sg@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-30007-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30007

--- Comment #12 from Stas Sergeev <stsp at users dot sourceforge.net> ---
(In reply to Jonathon Anderson from comment #8)
> The proposed la_premap and la_premap_dlmem (part of the dlmem() patch)
> collectively "solve" this problem by granting LD_AUDIT some limited control
> over the object (segment) mapping process. My first impression from reading
> the test cases, they seem a bit too specific to this use case. IMHO they are
> also out-of-scope for LD_AUDIT:

OK, if this is the case (which is
entirely possible, even if I don't
agree with the provided reasoning),
then let's just not use audit. :)
I can just add the "premap_ops"
optional pointer to dlmem().

Advantages: much, much fewer changes.
No need for dlload_audit_module() for
that use-case, but I'll keep discussing
it as a "bonus", in case someone finds
it interesting to load audit modules at
run-time.
Everything is confined within dlmem().
Perfect for my use-case.
Plain perfect.

Disadvantages:
Well, extra arg that most people will
set to NULL. Very small disadvantage,
given that this API is not standard anyways.
And it will not be possible to specify the
reloc address for pre-existing functions
like dlopem()/dlmopen(), or prospective ones
like BSD's fdlopen(). I find that a bit pity
given that people requested that functionality
for currently existing APIs, but not a
problem for my use-case. I only need to
control dlmem(), not to help others on
stackoverflow. :)

So sounds better?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-15 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-16 14:13 [Bug dynamic-link/30007] New: rfe: dlopen to user buffer or " stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-01-17 14:17 ` [Bug dynamic-link/30007] " adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-01-17 14:35 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-01-19 13:23 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-01-19 13:46 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-01-20  6:55 ` [Bug dynamic-link/30007] rfe: dlopen " stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-02-15 16:58 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-14  3:20 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-14 13:21 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-03-15  5:34 ` janderson at rice dot edu
2023-03-15  6:33 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-15 10:03 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-15 11:05 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-15 11:41 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net [this message]
2023-03-15 12:07 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-17  6:44 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-18 23:28 ` janderson at rice dot edu
2023-03-19  2:12 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-19  2:37 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-19  9:47 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-19 10:14 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-19 13:56 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-23 10:34 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-27  7:12 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-27 17:16 ` janderson at rice dot edu
2023-03-28  1:29 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-28  5:02 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-28  5:37 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-28  6:17 ` janderson at rice dot edu
2023-03-28  9:14 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-29 15:26 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-31 15:43 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-31 15:53 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-03-31 16:08 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-04-03  9:28 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-04-03  9:28 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-04-14 19:09 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-04-14 19:11 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-04-14 19:12 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-05-08 14:51 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-30007-131-KfViTSZ9Sg@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).