public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/30100] [patch] add dlmem() Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:48:49 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-30100-131-uCPqksp6xO@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-30100-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30100 --- Comment #4 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> --- (In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #3) > But as indicated above, I have problems running this patch > through the test-suit. All built tests use the system-wide > elf interpreter, so after I changed the "struct rtld_global_ro" > I have to use patchelf on a test binaries to set the interpreter > to the newly-built one. > Please tell me how to solve that problem, because of course > running through the test-suit is a requirement for submission > to the mail list. > The glibc testsuite has tests that either run through the built loader and libraries (by invoking the loader directly with --library-path or by building the tests to use the build loader when configure with --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests) or use a minimal container (where you can override system-wide configuration). You can also test a binary with the glibc loader by using the 'testrun.sh' script in the build folder. The former is the default for tests, while the latter requires some extra care (check the tests-container tests on Makefiles). So first thing you would like to check is whether the new patch adds any regression by running 'make check'. Then you need to add any extra tests to exercise the new feature, if they require changing any global state (such as global files, etc.) it is preferable to provide them as tests-containers. > Please let me know if there are any alternatives, too, like > eg donating on patreon to someone who can do the remaining work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-09 12:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-02-09 9:47 [Bug dynamic-link/30100] New: " stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 9:48 ` [Bug dynamic-link/30100] " stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 11:51 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2023-02-09 12:17 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 12:48 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org [this message] 2023-02-09 13:59 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 14:16 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2023-02-09 14:34 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 15:14 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 16:51 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 16:55 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2023-02-09 16:56 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2023-02-09 17:37 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 17:58 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 18:22 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2023-02-09 18:29 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 18:49 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 18:56 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 19:00 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-09 19:02 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2023-02-10 8:27 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-10 8:30 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-10 8:30 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-10 9:08 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-10 10:04 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-10 13:09 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-10 13:46 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2023-02-11 17:37 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-11 19:08 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-11 19:37 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-02-16 13:40 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-03-17 6:41 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-03-17 6:45 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-03-18 18:14 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-03-18 23:30 ` janderson at rice dot edu 2023-03-19 2:14 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-03-20 15:47 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-03-20 16:06 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net 2023-03-29 14:45 ` sam at gentoo dot org 2023-05-05 14:29 ` stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-30100-131-uCPqksp6xO@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).