public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug dynamic-link/31164] New: dlmopen()'ing a shared library that dlopen()'s a non-existent library during initialization returns prematurely
@ 2023-12-13 17:33 goodhart at amazon dot com
  2023-12-13 19:42 ` [Bug dynamic-link/31164] " goodhart at amazon dot com
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: goodhart at amazon dot com @ 2023-12-13 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31164

            Bug ID: 31164
           Summary: dlmopen()'ing a shared library that dlopen()'s a
                    non-existent library during initialization returns
                    prematurely
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.26
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: dynamic-link
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: goodhart at amazon dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Possibly related to https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18684, if
you attempt to dlmopen() a library that itself makes a failed call to dlopen()
internally as part of initialization, control appears to be returned to the
outer dlmopen() call immediately, instead of the inner dlopen() call returning
null as expected. In contrast, using dlopen() works as expected.

In GDB, setting a breakpoint immediately before foo() shows:
#1  0x00007ffff7de7ef2 in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#2  0x00007ffff7de7fe6 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#3  0x00007ffff7dec16d in dl_open_worker () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#4  0x00007ffff7078374 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#5  0x00007ffff7deb9a9 in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#6  0x00007ffff7bd6960 in dlmopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
#7  0x00007ffff7078374 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#8  0x00007ffff7bd6675 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
#9  0x00007ffff7bd6a36 in dlmopen () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
#10 0x000000000040086c in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe3a8) at
with_dlmopen.cpp:7

Running a single step, instead of moving to the line that prints "I expected to
see this", control transfers to _dl_catch_error():

#0  0x00007ffff7078361 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x00007ffff7deb9a9 in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#2  0x00007ffff7bd6960 in dlmopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
#3  0x00007ffff7078374 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4  0x00007ffff7bd6675 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
#5  0x00007ffff7bd6a36 in dlmopen () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
#6  0x000000000040086c in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe3a8) at
with_dlmopen.cpp:7

The assembly suggests that this is occurring because of some
setjmp()/pseudo-exception handling logic within glibc.

Reproduction commands:

// foo
> cat foo.cpp
#include <dlfcn.h>
#include <iostream>

void __attribute__((constructor)) foo() {
  dlopen("libdoesnotexist.so", RTLD_LAZY);
  std::cerr << "I expected to see this" << std::endl;
}

> g++ -g foo.cpp -fpic -shared -o libfoo.so -ldl

// with_dlmopen
> cat  cat with_dlmopen.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <dlfcn.h>
#include <sysexits.h>

int main(int argc, char * argv[]){

  void * handle = dlmopen(LM_ID_NEWLM, "./libfoo.so", RTLD_LAZY);

  if(!handle){
    std::cerr <<  dlerror() << std::endl;
    return EX_SOFTWARE;
  }

  return EX_OK;
}

> g++ -g with_dlopen.cpp -o with_dlopen -ldl
> ./with_dlopen
< I expected to see this

// with_dlmopen
> cat with_dlmopen.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <dlfcn.h>
#include <sysexits.h>

int main(int argc, char * argv[]){

  void * handle = dlmopen(LM_ID_NEWLM, "./libfoo.so", RTLD_LAZY);

  if(!handle){
    std::cerr <<  dlerror() << std::endl;
    return EX_SOFTWARE;
  }

  return EX_OK;
}

> g++ -g with_dlmopen.cpp -o with_dlmopen -ldl
> ./with_dlmopen
< libdoesnotexist.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug dynamic-link/31164] dlmopen()'ing a shared library that dlopen()'s a non-existent library during initialization returns prematurely
  2023-12-13 17:33 [Bug dynamic-link/31164] New: dlmopen()'ing a shared library that dlopen()'s a non-existent library during initialization returns prematurely goodhart at amazon dot com
@ 2023-12-13 19:42 ` goodhart at amazon dot com
  2023-12-14  7:58 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  2024-01-11 15:05 ` goodhart at amazon dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: goodhart at amazon dot com @ 2023-12-13 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31164

--- Comment #1 from Goodhart, Taylor <goodhart at amazon dot com> ---
Apologies, pasted the same thing twice in repro. Here's with_dlopen.cpp:

> cat with_dlopen.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <dlfcn.h>
#include <sysexits.h>

int main(int argc, char * argv[]){

  void * handle = dlopen("./libfoo.so", RTLD_LAZY);

  if(!handle){
    std::cerr << dlerror() << std::endl;
    return EX_SOFTWARE;
  }

  return EX_OK;
}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug dynamic-link/31164] dlmopen()'ing a shared library that dlopen()'s a non-existent library during initialization returns prematurely
  2023-12-13 17:33 [Bug dynamic-link/31164] New: dlmopen()'ing a shared library that dlopen()'s a non-existent library during initialization returns prematurely goodhart at amazon dot com
  2023-12-13 19:42 ` [Bug dynamic-link/31164] " goodhart at amazon dot com
@ 2023-12-14  7:58 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  2024-01-11 15:05 ` goodhart at amazon dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2023-12-14  7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31164

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fweimer at redhat dot com

--- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
I believe this was fixed in glibc 2.34 via this commit:

commit b2964eb1d9a6b8ab1250e8a881cf406182da5875
Author: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 21 19:49:51 2021 +0200

    dlfcn: Failures after dlmopen should not terminate process [BZ #24772]

    Commit 9e78f6f6e7134a5f299cc8de77370218f8019237 ("Implement
    _dl_catch_error, _dl_signal_error in libc.so [BZ #16628]") has the
    side effect that distinct namespaces, as created by dlmopen, now have
    separate implementations of the rtld exception mechanism.  This means
    that the call to _dl_catch_error from libdl in a secondary namespace
    does not actually install an exception handler because the
    thread-local variable catch_hook in the libc.so copy in the secondary
    namespace is distinct from that of the base namepace.  As a result, a
    dlsym/dlopen/... failure in a secondary namespace terminates the process
    with a dynamic linker error because it looks to the exception handler
    mechanism as if no handler has been installed.

    This commit restores GLRO (dl_catch_error) and uses it to set the
    handler in the base namespace.

    Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella  <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>

(There have been other fixes for ld.so exception handling and dlmopen, and more
generally dlmopen.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug dynamic-link/31164] dlmopen()'ing a shared library that dlopen()'s a non-existent library during initialization returns prematurely
  2023-12-13 17:33 [Bug dynamic-link/31164] New: dlmopen()'ing a shared library that dlopen()'s a non-existent library during initialization returns prematurely goodhart at amazon dot com
  2023-12-13 19:42 ` [Bug dynamic-link/31164] " goodhart at amazon dot com
  2023-12-14  7:58 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2024-01-11 15:05 ` goodhart at amazon dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: goodhart at amazon dot com @ 2024-01-11 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31164

--- Comment #3 from Goodhart, Taylor <goodhart at amazon dot com> ---
Thanks Florian, that sounds like precisely the issue. I'll re-test with 3.24
and report back.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-11 15:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-13 17:33 [Bug dynamic-link/31164] New: dlmopen()'ing a shared library that dlopen()'s a non-existent library during initialization returns prematurely goodhart at amazon dot com
2023-12-13 19:42 ` [Bug dynamic-link/31164] " goodhart at amazon dot com
2023-12-14  7:58 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2024-01-11 15:05 ` goodhart at amazon dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).