public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/31661] New: NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN not available in getconf
@ 2024-04-19 21:13 mohd.akram at outlook dot com
2024-05-04 11:13 ` [Bug libc/31661] " mohd.akram at outlook dot com
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mohd.akram at outlook dot com @ 2024-04-19 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31661
Bug ID: 31661
Summary: NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN not available in
getconf
Product: glibc
Version: 2.38
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: mohd.akram at outlook dot com
CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
getconf should support `NPROCESSORS_CONF` and `NPROCESSORS_ONLN`, without a
leading underscore, as specified in POSIX:
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=339
This is already supported in macOS, FreeBSD, Solaris and other operating
systems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/31661] NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN not available in getconf 2024-04-19 21:13 [Bug libc/31661] New: NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN not available in getconf mohd.akram at outlook dot com @ 2024-05-04 11:13 ` mohd.akram at outlook dot com 2024-05-06 12:28 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2024-05-30 14:07 ` mohd.akram at outlook dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: mohd.akram at outlook dot com @ 2024-05-04 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31661 --- Comment #1 from Mohamed Akram <mohd.akram at outlook dot com> --- Created attachment 15492 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15492&action=edit add NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN to getconf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/31661] NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN not available in getconf 2024-04-19 21:13 [Bug libc/31661] New: NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN not available in getconf mohd.akram at outlook dot com 2024-05-04 11:13 ` [Bug libc/31661] " mohd.akram at outlook dot com @ 2024-05-06 12:28 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2024-05-30 14:07 ` mohd.akram at outlook dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2024-05-06 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31661 Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot o | |rg --- Comment #2 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> --- (In reply to Mohamed Akram from comment #1) > Created attachment 15492 [details] > add NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN to getconf Could you please send the patch to libc-alpha for revision? The wiki has all the information on how to do [1]. [1] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/31661] NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN not available in getconf 2024-04-19 21:13 [Bug libc/31661] New: NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN not available in getconf mohd.akram at outlook dot com 2024-05-04 11:13 ` [Bug libc/31661] " mohd.akram at outlook dot com 2024-05-06 12:28 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2024-05-30 14:07 ` mohd.akram at outlook dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: mohd.akram at outlook dot com @ 2024-05-30 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31661 --- Comment #3 from Mohamed Akram <mohd.akram at outlook dot com> --- (In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #2) > (In reply to Mohamed Akram from comment #1) > > Created attachment 15492 [details] > > add NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN to getconf > > Could you please send the patch to libc-alpha for revision? The wiki has all > the information on how to do [1]. > > [1] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist Thank you, I've sent a patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-30 14:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-04-19 21:13 [Bug libc/31661] New: NPROCESSORS_CONF and NPROCESSORS_ONLN not available in getconf mohd.akram at outlook dot com 2024-05-04 11:13 ` [Bug libc/31661] " mohd.akram at outlook dot com 2024-05-06 12:28 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2024-05-30 14:07 ` mohd.akram at outlook dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).