public inbox for glibc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [glibc/release/2.31/master] x86_64: Remove unneeded static PIE check for undefined weak diagnostic
@ 2021-08-18 20:45 Fangrui Song
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Fangrui Song @ 2021-08-18 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-cvs

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=094618d4015ca4781bc5ae376ffbe3fdf4cf3e27

commit 094618d4015ca4781bc5ae376ffbe3fdf4cf3e27
Author: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 8 14:26:22 2021 -0700

    x86_64: Remove unneeded static PIE check for undefined weak diagnostic
    
    https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21782 dropped an ld
    diagnostic for R_X86_64_PC32 referencing an undefined weak symbol in
    -pie links.  Arguably keeping the diagnostic like other ports is more
    correct, since statically resolving movl foo(%rip), %eax to the
    link-time zero address produces a corrupted output.
    
    It turns out that --enable-static-pie builds do not depend on the ld
    behavior. GCC generates GOT indirection for weak declarations for
    -fPIE/-fPIC, so what ld does with the PC-relative relocation doesn't
    really matter.
    
    Reviewed-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
    (cherry picked from commit 115d242456de158e698ffb0f9a5fee3118e9e825)

Diff:
---
 sysdeps/x86_64/configure    | 33 ---------------------------------
 sysdeps/x86_64/configure.ac | 25 -------------------------
 2 files changed, 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/configure b/sysdeps/x86_64/configure
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 84f82c2406..fc1840e23f
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/configure
+++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/configure
@@ -107,39 +107,6 @@ if test x"$build_mathvec" = xnotset; then
   build_mathvec=yes
 fi
 
-if test "$static_pie" = yes; then
-  { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for linker static PIE support" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking for linker static PIE support... " >&6; }
-if ${libc_cv_ld_static_pie+:} false; then :
-  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
-else
-  cat > conftest.s <<\EOF
-	.text
-	.global _start
-	.weak foo
-_start:
-	leaq	foo(%rip), %rax
-EOF
-  libc_cv_pie_option="-Wl,-pie"
-  if { ac_try='${CC-cc} $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS -nostartfiles -nostdlib $no_ssp $libc_cv_pie_option -o conftest conftest.s 1>&5'
-  { { eval echo "\"\$as_me\":${as_lineno-$LINENO}: \"$ac_try\""; } >&5
-  (eval $ac_try) 2>&5
-  ac_status=$?
-  $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: \$? = $ac_status" >&5
-  test $ac_status = 0; }; }; then
-    libc_cv_ld_static_pie=yes
-  else
-    libc_cv_ld_static_pie=no
-  fi
-rm -f conftest*
-fi
-{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $libc_cv_ld_static_pie" >&5
-$as_echo "$libc_cv_ld_static_pie" >&6; }
-  if test "$libc_cv_ld_static_pie" != yes; then
-    as_fn_error $? "linker support for static PIE needed" "$LINENO" 5
-  fi
-fi
-
 $as_echo "#define PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN 1" >>confdefs.h
 
 
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/configure.ac b/sysdeps/x86_64/configure.ac
index cdaba0c075..611a7d9ba3 100644
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/configure.ac
+++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/configure.ac
@@ -53,31 +53,6 @@ if test x"$build_mathvec" = xnotset; then
   build_mathvec=yes
 fi
 
-dnl Check if linker supports static PIE with the fix for
-dnl
-dnl https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21782
-dnl
-if test "$static_pie" = yes; then
-  AC_CACHE_CHECK(for linker static PIE support, libc_cv_ld_static_pie, [dnl
-cat > conftest.s <<\EOF
-	.text
-	.global _start
-	.weak foo
-_start:
-	leaq	foo(%rip), %rax
-EOF
-  libc_cv_pie_option="-Wl,-pie"
-  if AC_TRY_COMMAND(${CC-cc} $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS -nostartfiles -nostdlib $no_ssp $libc_cv_pie_option -o conftest conftest.s 1>&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD); then
-    libc_cv_ld_static_pie=yes
-  else
-    libc_cv_ld_static_pie=no
-  fi
-rm -f conftest*])
-  if test "$libc_cv_ld_static_pie" != yes; then
-    AC_MSG_ERROR([linker support for static PIE needed])
-  fi
-fi
-
 dnl It is always possible to access static and hidden symbols in an
 dnl position independent way.
 AC_DEFINE(PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-08-18 20:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-18 20:45 [glibc/release/2.31/master] x86_64: Remove unneeded static PIE check for undefined weak diagnostic Fangrui Song

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).