public inbox for gnu-gabi@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>, gnu-gabi@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add PT_GNU_SFRAME segment
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:13:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <088fb3ea96e64f2dcc5e2af1d49bec3fdab3482a.camel@klomp.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230123195619.16513-1-indu.bhagat@oracle.com>

Hi Indu,

On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 11:56 -0800, Indu Bhagat via Gnu-gabi wrote:
> As I submit this patch, I am reminded of my ongoing unease with using the
> keyword "unwind information" with SFrame format. SFrame format, is the Simple
> Frame format, which represents the minimal necessary information for
> backtracing:
>   - Canonical Frame Address (CFA)
>   - Frame Pointer (FP)
>   - Return Address (RA)
> As such, one can argue that there is a clear distinction between "backtrace"
> (=simple call trace) and "unwind"(=stack walk + recover state/regs). 
> 
> What do you think will the "correct" terminology here (if there is one) ?
> Simple Frame format is for backtracing only, but calling it a "backtrace
> format" also sounds off. May be "backtracing format" ? Simple Frame, SFrame,
>   backtracing format...
> 
> Thoughts?

What about calling it a "call trace"?
Although technically it is a "return trace".

Cheers,

Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-24 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-23 19:56 Indu Bhagat
2023-01-24 11:13 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2023-01-24 13:10   ` Carlos O'Donell
2023-01-24 13:20   ` Florian Weimer
2023-01-24 14:57     ` Carlos O'Donell
2023-01-24 21:52       ` Indu Bhagat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=088fb3ea96e64f2dcc5e2af1d49bec3fdab3482a.camel@klomp.org \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=gnu-gabi@sourceware.org \
    --cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).