public inbox for gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Leto <jaleto@gmail.com>
To: "Robert G. Brown" <rgb@phy.duke.edu>
Cc: GSL Discussion list <gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: New rngs...
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9aaadf9c0910140912q7532fd82n9317b6e735dbc2ca@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910080934250.3130@lilith>

Howdy,

I would very much like to see these RNGs added to GSL, so that I can
add them to Math::GSL and access them from Perl. I am willing to work
on integrating these into GSL, as long as the GSL maintainers want
this to be done. Should I continue in this direction?


Cheers,


[0] http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-GSL/

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Robert G. Brown <rgb@phy.duke.edu> wrote:
> Dear Brian et. al.
>
> As we're discussing the roadmap for a new GSL, I'd like to offer up at
> least two, maybe three more random number generators for inclusion in
> the GSL list that have been contributed and integrated into dieharder.
> One that I think should absolutely be there is rng_aes -- basically an
> implementation of AES as a random number generator.  AES is
> cryptographic grade random and is arguably very close to a "gold
> standard" that can be used to test random number generator testers, as
> there is always an unstated addition to the null hypothesis "Assuming
> that this is a perfect random number generator AND that this is a valid
> test...", and failure of the latter is very difficult to discriminate
> from failure of the former without at least a few generators for which
> failure of the former is arguably less likely than failure of the
> latter.  rng_threefish does the same thing on top of many rounds of
> skein.  I was using aespipe to feed dieharder in a pipe until these were
> contributed, but having them integrated is worthwhile, especially given
> that rng_aes is respectably fast, around 1/5 the speed of mt19937.
>
>   rgb
>
> Robert G. Brown                        http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
> Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
> Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
> Phone: 1-919-660-2567  Fax: 919-660-2525     email:rgb@phy.duke.edu
>
>
>



-- 

Jonathan Leto
jonathan@leto.net
http://leto.net

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-14 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-08 13:46 Robert G. Brown
2009-10-14 16:12 ` Jonathan Leto [this message]
2009-10-14 16:59   ` Robert G. Brown
2009-10-23 21:28   ` Brian Gough

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9aaadf9c0910140912q7532fd82n9317b6e735dbc2ca@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jaleto@gmail.com \
    --cc=gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rgb@phy.duke.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).