From: Stan Pinte <stan@altosw.be>
To: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: The GTK2 line of development
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 10:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030601200641.1b285ab6.stan@altosw.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030526174448.GC6014@lark>
On Mon, 26 May 2003 18:44:48 +0100
Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003, Stan Pinte wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 24 May 2003 12:41:11 +0100
> > Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > > - within savannah.nongnu.org
> > > * has the advantage that all guile-gtk stuff is in the same place
> > > (maybe it's an advantage, who knows)
> >
> > I would favor that option, as I just moved the (gnome guile) code from
> > the Gnome CVS to the savannah Guile-gtk project. (All the (gnome guile)
> > code is in a separate module, under
> > http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/guile-gtk/gnome-guile-0.1/
>
> Sounds reasonable. The developers on this codebase will probably be
> mainly guile hackers rather than gnome hackers, so that seems about
> right. Then we just have to figure out package names and module names.
>
> The gtk-1.2 code uses the module name (gtk gtk), if I'm not mistaken.
> See the previous email for my thoughts on namespaces -- there's no
> collision here, in my eyes. The guile-gnome code that was in
> gnome-guile-0.10 (I am getting confused now) uses the module (gnome
> gnome). Hmm...
>
> I guess ideally(tm) I would like the (gnome ...) namespace to be
> reserved for the 2.x version. That does conflict with the current naming
> of your project, does it not? Still, if you continue to use (gnome
> guile) and submodules, there shouldn't be any problems.
Currently, the naming used are the following:
(gnome gnome).
I agree to change it to (gnome guile) as soon as it compiles and runs ok...
>
> The win-win situation would be to coerce you to join 2.x development,
> hehehe ;-)
I'ld really like to have a first working version of the gnome bindings, rather than migrate the whole stuff now...but no problem for migratring toward 2.x afterwards.
>
> Do I have a correct summary of the situation?
Yes,
Stan.
>
> regards,
>
> wingo.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-02 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-24 12:04 Andy Wingo
2003-05-24 14:08 ` Stan Pinte
2003-06-02 6:51 ` Andy Wingo
2003-06-02 10:06 ` Stan Pinte [this message]
2003-05-25 23:31 ` Kevin Ryde
2003-06-02 6:51 ` Andy Wingo
2003-06-02 12:05 ` Dale P. Smith
2003-06-02 13:04 ` Andy Wingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030601200641.1b285ab6.stan@altosw.be \
--to=stan@altosw.be \
--cc=guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).