From: Steve Tell <tell@telltronics.org>
To: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: (gnome gtk) et al
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 04:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0304110035290.3979-100000@ariel.lan.telltronics.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030408161816.599d8e99.david@altosw.be>
On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, David Pirotte wrote:
> > I really wonder why so few people seem interested in GTK+ 2.0
> > bindings. I'd love to have Goops-based bindings for 2.0 (OO is really
> > nice, if not necessary ;-) when dealing with widget sets IMO), and
> > could lend a hand from time to time.
>
> I really really would like to have goops-based any bindings, but Gtk+ 2.0
> would be a must, I backup the idea
I'm interested in gtk+-2.0 (without requiring gnome) bindings also, and
not only becaused I've been asked when some code of mine will build work
with gtk+-2.0/2.2.
Not knowing much about goops yet, what would such bindings look like? I'd
prefer to have somthing that is largely code-compatible with the current
guile-gtk for gtk+-1.2. Idealy I'd like a single guile+C codebase to be
able to support both gtk+-1.2 and gtk+2.x for some transition period.
It looks like this is reasonably straightforward for pure C uses of gtk+.
Sounds like guile-gobject from gnome is the best way to proceed in this
direction. Or is there somthing else I should download, test, and try to
help with?
Steve
--
Steve Tell tell@telltronics.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-11 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030407144511.GA1489@lark>
2003-04-07 19:57 ` Ariel Rios
2003-04-07 20:15 ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-04-08 10:34 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-04-08 14:56 ` Stan Pinte
2003-04-08 20:03 ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-04-08 21:33 ` David Pirotte
2003-04-11 4:48 ` Steve Tell [this message]
2003-04-11 10:00 ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-04-09 15:24 ` Stan Pinte
2003-04-10 17:05 ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-04-10 17:10 ` David Pirotte
2003-05-06 6:52 ` Stan Pinte
2003-05-06 15:33 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-05-06 15:45 ` Stan Pinte
2003-05-07 13:07 ` Stan Pinte
2003-05-07 14:02 ` Stan Pinte
2003-05-07 14:10 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-05-07 14:38 ` Stan Pinte
2003-05-07 15:17 ` Stan Pinte
2003-05-07 18:16 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-05-08 11:43 ` Stan Pinte
2003-05-12 14:18 ` Stan Pinte
[not found] ` <1052750737.26632.4.camel@tosca.elektra.com.mx>
2003-05-12 16:48 ` Stan Pinte
2003-05-14 9:17 ` Andy Wingo
2003-05-16 14:26 ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-05-20 20:08 ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-05-23 22:00 ` Kevin Ryde
2003-05-26 13:04 ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-06-23 14:14 ` Andy Wingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0304110035290.3979-100000@ariel.lan.telltronics.org \
--to=tell@telltronics.org \
--cc=guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).