[OBV] Fix compilation error after target_wait_hook change

[OBV] Fix compilation error after target_wait_hook change

[Pierre Muller]

Pedro's patch 

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-05/msg00459.html
generates a compilation failure in gdbtk/generic/gdbtk-hooks.c

  The patch below fixes it.

As this is a rather automatic change, I
took the liberty of checking it in as obvious fix.

  I hope that this is OK.


Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB




ChangeLog Entry:

2009-05-24  Pierre Muller  <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>

       * Adapt to target_wait_hook change.
       * generic/gdbtk-hooks.c (gdbtk_wait): Add `options' argument.


Index: generic/gdbtk-hooks.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbtk/generic/gdbtk-hooks.c,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -p -r1.48 gdbtk-hooks.c
--- generic/gdbtk-hooks.c       6 Apr 2009 23:11:10 -0000       1.48
+++ generic/gdbtk-hooks.c       24 May 2009 08:32:55 -0000
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void gdbtk_detach (void);
 static void gdbtk_file_changed (char *);
 static void gdbtk_exec_file_display (char *);
 static void gdbtk_call_command (struct cmd_list_element *, char *, int);
-static ptid_t gdbtk_wait (ptid_t, struct target_waitstatus *);
+static ptid_t gdbtk_wait (ptid_t, struct target_waitstatus *, int);
 int x_event (int);
 static int gdbtk_query (const char *, va_list);
 static void gdbtk_warning (const char *, va_list);
@@ -658,11 +658,11 @@ gdbtk_post_add_symbol ()
    target.  */

 static ptid_t
-gdbtk_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_waitstatus *ourstatus)
+gdbtk_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_waitstatus *ourstatus, int options)
 {
   gdbtk_force_detach = 0;
   gdbtk_start_timer ();
-  ptid = target_wait (ptid, ourstatus);
+  ptid = target_wait (ptid, ourstatus, options);
   gdbtk_stop_timer ();
   gdbtk_ptid = ptid;

Re: [OBV] Fix compilation error after target_wait_hook change

[Keith Seitz]

Pierre Muller wrote:
> As this is a rather automatic change, I
> took the liberty of checking it in as obvious fix.
> 
>   I hope that this is OK.

Absolutely! Thank you very much!

Keith