public inbox for insight@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: Source lines out of sync with instructions
@ 2002-11-14 12:08 Rod Boyce
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rod Boyce @ 2002-11-14 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Tim', Rod Boyce; +Cc: 'Fernando Nasser', insight

From what I can see in your makefile the dependencies are hand coded.  
Are you sure these are all the dependencies? 
Have you tied compiling on a different machine?
Have you tired debugging on a different machine?
Are you sure that the instructions are not just being executed out of order?

These are all C++ files are you sure that your classes and / or threads are
not changing the order?

I'm not sure about Intel machines but our embedded envoriment and the RISC
processor reorders instructions and does all sorts of tricks to increase
speed it can be interesting to debug.
These are all things that have nothing to do with GDB.  
I'm sure others on this list can think up many more questions these are just
the obvious questions.  

The fault could also lie with GDB.
Are you using a GDB that came with your distribution?
If you recompiled GDB then what options did you use?
Are you sure you are using the latest released version of GDB?
Have you thoroughly searched the mailing list archives on both the GDB and
insight mailing list?
The same applies to these questions I'm sure there are many more others on
this list can think up.  
Are you sure this is not a known problem with your version of GDB / insight?


Rod


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tim [mailto:Tim@deltacompsys.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:28 AM
To:	Rod Boyce
Cc:	'Fernando Nasser'; insight@sources.redhat.com
Subject:	RE: Source lines out of sync with instructions

Here is my make file ... see anything wrong with it?

ARCH = 
CC = $(ARCH)gcc
CXX = $(ARCH)g++
CFLAGS = -Wall -ggdb -O0 -I .. -DHANDLE_PRAGMA_PACK_PUSH_POP=1
-DHANDLE_SYSV_PRAGMA=1 -fsigned-char
LDFLAGS = -ggdb -O0 
LIBS = 
STRIP = $(ARCH)strip
LDD = $(ARCH)ldd

OBJFILES = objs/main.o \
		   objs/MSTerminal.o \
		   objs/QTerm.o \
		   objs/Serial.o \
		   objs/MemManager.o \
		   objs/MenuObjs.o \
		   objs/Summary.o \
		   objs/SSheet.o \
		   objs/ParamSS.o

TARGET = msterminal

msterminal: $(OBJFILES)
	$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJFILES) $(LIBS) -o $(TARGET)
	
objs/main.o: main.cc main.h MSTerminal.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) main.cc -o objs/main.o -c
	
objs/MSTerminal.o: MSTerminal.cc MSTerminal.h main.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) MSTerminal.cc -o objs/MSTerminal.o -c
	
objs/QTerm.o: QTerm.cc QTerm.h ../Serial.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) QTerm.cc -o objs/QTerm.o -c
	
objs/Serial.o: ../Serial.cc ../Serial.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) ../Serial.cc -o objs/Serial.o -c

objs/MemManager.o: ../MemManager.cc ../MemManager.h ../SharedData.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) ../MemManager.cc -o objs/MemManager.o -c

objs/MenuObjs.o: MenuObjs.cc MenuObjs.h MenuHdr.h MenuTbl.h Summary.h
ParamSS.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) MenuObjs.cc -o objs/MenuObjs.o -c

objs/Summary.o: Summary.cc Summary.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) Summary.cc -o objs/Summary.o -c

objs/SSheet.o: SSheet.cc SSheet.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) SSheet.cc -o objs/SSheet.o -c

objs/ParamSS.o: ParamSS.cc ParamSS.h SSheet.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) ParamSS.cc -o objs/ParamSS.o -c	

clean:
	rm -f $(TARGET)
	cd objs
	rm -f $(OBJFILES)
	cd ..


On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:29, Rod Boyce wrote:
> More importantly and the first thing you should try before asking question
> you should do a make clean and then a make.  I find this problem is 999
out
> of a 1000 is caused by dependencies not being compiled correctly after
> changes to source code.  This usually means you make file is not working
> correctly and cannot determine what has changed in your source.  This
> includes everything from clock synchronization to not being able to write
a
> correct make file I have seen more bad makefiles than good makefiles.  
> 
> I would strongly suggest deleting all object files and rebuilding this
> should be the first step before asking this kind of question on ANY list.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Rod 
> 
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Fernando Nasser [mailto:fnasser@redhat.com] 
> Sent:	Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:23 AM
> To:	Tim; insight@sources.redhat.com
> Subject:	Re: Source lines out of sync with instructions
> 
> Can you try and run without the GUI?  If when you say step and get into
your
> 
> subroutine you see the same problem (use the list command to print the
> source 
> lines or look at what was printed by gdb when it stopped -- usually a line

> number but you may get an hex address instead/as well).
> 
> Maybe the version of GDB you are using has a problem with your
architecture 
> (insight is just a GUI to the GNU debugger, which still does the actual 
> breakpoint debugging).  Is this i386, MIPS, or what?
> 
> Regards,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> Tim wrote:> Thanx! tried -O0 with no luck.  Things are still out of sync.
> It
> > appears to happen only after I step into a new compilation unit.  That
> > is, in main everything is fine, but when I break or step into the next
> > compilation unit things get messed up.
> > 
> > Any other thoughts?
> > 
> > On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 09:45, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > 
> >>Tim wrote:> I have seen this with gdb console so I don't think it is a
> problem with
> >>
> >>>insight, but perhaps someone can help me.
> >>>
> >>>When I'm debugging the source code lines get out of sync with the
actual
> >>>instructions.  Why is this and more importantly how do I stop it?
> >>>
> >>>Thanx!
> >>
> >>Try compiling your program without optimization...
> >>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* RE: Source lines out of sync with instructions
  2002-11-14 10:29 Rod Boyce
  2002-11-14 10:55 ` Tim
@ 2002-11-14 11:27 ` Tim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tim @ 2002-11-14 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rod Boyce; +Cc: 'Fernando Nasser', insight

Here is my make file ... see anything wrong with it?

ARCH = 
CC = $(ARCH)gcc
CXX = $(ARCH)g++
CFLAGS = -Wall -ggdb -O0 -I .. -DHANDLE_PRAGMA_PACK_PUSH_POP=1
-DHANDLE_SYSV_PRAGMA=1 -fsigned-char
LDFLAGS = -ggdb -O0 
LIBS = 
STRIP = $(ARCH)strip
LDD = $(ARCH)ldd

OBJFILES = objs/main.o \
		   objs/MSTerminal.o \
		   objs/QTerm.o \
		   objs/Serial.o \
		   objs/MemManager.o \
		   objs/MenuObjs.o \
		   objs/Summary.o \
		   objs/SSheet.o \
		   objs/ParamSS.o

TARGET = msterminal

msterminal: $(OBJFILES)
	$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJFILES) $(LIBS) -o $(TARGET)
	
objs/main.o: main.cc main.h MSTerminal.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) main.cc -o objs/main.o -c
	
objs/MSTerminal.o: MSTerminal.cc MSTerminal.h main.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) MSTerminal.cc -o objs/MSTerminal.o -c
	
objs/QTerm.o: QTerm.cc QTerm.h ../Serial.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) QTerm.cc -o objs/QTerm.o -c
	
objs/Serial.o: ../Serial.cc ../Serial.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) ../Serial.cc -o objs/Serial.o -c

objs/MemManager.o: ../MemManager.cc ../MemManager.h ../SharedData.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) ../MemManager.cc -o objs/MemManager.o -c

objs/MenuObjs.o: MenuObjs.cc MenuObjs.h MenuHdr.h MenuTbl.h Summary.h
ParamSS.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) MenuObjs.cc -o objs/MenuObjs.o -c

objs/Summary.o: Summary.cc Summary.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) Summary.cc -o objs/Summary.o -c

objs/SSheet.o: SSheet.cc SSheet.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) SSheet.cc -o objs/SSheet.o -c

objs/ParamSS.o: ParamSS.cc ParamSS.h SSheet.h
	$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) ParamSS.cc -o objs/ParamSS.o -c	

clean:
	rm -f $(TARGET)
	cd objs
	rm -f $(OBJFILES)
	cd ..


On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:29, Rod Boyce wrote:
> More importantly and the first thing you should try before asking question
> you should do a make clean and then a make.  I find this problem is 999 out
> of a 1000 is caused by dependencies not being compiled correctly after
> changes to source code.  This usually means you make file is not working
> correctly and cannot determine what has changed in your source.  This
> includes everything from clock synchronization to not being able to write a
> correct make file I have seen more bad makefiles than good makefiles.  
> 
> I would strongly suggest deleting all object files and rebuilding this
> should be the first step before asking this kind of question on ANY list.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Rod 
> 
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Fernando Nasser [mailto:fnasser@redhat.com] 
> Sent:	Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:23 AM
> To:	Tim; insight@sources.redhat.com
> Subject:	Re: Source lines out of sync with instructions
> 
> Can you try and run without the GUI?  If when you say step and get into your
> 
> subroutine you see the same problem (use the list command to print the
> source 
> lines or look at what was printed by gdb when it stopped -- usually a line 
> number but you may get an hex address instead/as well).
> 
> Maybe the version of GDB you are using has a problem with your architecture 
> (insight is just a GUI to the GNU debugger, which still does the actual 
> breakpoint debugging).  Is this i386, MIPS, or what?
> 
> Regards,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> Tim wrote:> Thanx! tried -O0 with no luck.  Things are still out of sync.
> It
> > appears to happen only after I step into a new compilation unit.  That
> > is, in main everything is fine, but when I break or step into the next
> > compilation unit things get messed up.
> > 
> > Any other thoughts?
> > 
> > On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 09:45, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > 
> >>Tim wrote:> I have seen this with gdb console so I don't think it is a
> problem with
> >>
> >>>insight, but perhaps someone can help me.
> >>>
> >>>When I'm debugging the source code lines get out of sync with the actual
> >>>instructions.  Why is this and more importantly how do I stop it?
> >>>
> >>>Thanx!
> >>
> >>Try compiling your program without optimization...
> >>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* RE: Source lines out of sync with instructions
  2002-11-14 10:29 Rod Boyce
@ 2002-11-14 10:55 ` Tim
  2002-11-14 11:27 ` Tim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tim @ 2002-11-14 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rod Boyce; +Cc: 'Fernando Nasser', insight

Thanx! I tried again just to be sure by actually deleting the obj file
rather than using make clean.  Still has the problem.  

I also tried deleting the app and objs and typing out gcc -ggdb -Wall
... on the command line with the same results.

If the problem is a bad build I'm at a loss to understand what I'm doing
wrong...

Any other thoughts?  THanx!


On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:29, Rod Boyce wrote:
> More importantly and the first thing you should try before asking question
> you should do a make clean and then a make.  I find this problem is 999 out
> of a 1000 is caused by dependencies not being compiled correctly after
> changes to source code.  This usually means you make file is not working
> correctly and cannot determine what has changed in your source.  This
> includes everything from clock synchronization to not being able to write a
> correct make file I have seen more bad makefiles than good makefiles.  
> 
> I would strongly suggest deleting all object files and rebuilding this
> should be the first step before asking this kind of question on ANY list.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Rod 
> 
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Fernando Nasser [mailto:fnasser@redhat.com] 
> Sent:	Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:23 AM
> To:	Tim; insight@sources.redhat.com
> Subject:	Re: Source lines out of sync with instructions
> 
> Can you try and run without the GUI?  If when you say step and get into your
> 
> subroutine you see the same problem (use the list command to print the
> source 
> lines or look at what was printed by gdb when it stopped -- usually a line 
> number but you may get an hex address instead/as well).
> 
> Maybe the version of GDB you are using has a problem with your architecture 
> (insight is just a GUI to the GNU debugger, which still does the actual 
> breakpoint debugging).  Is this i386, MIPS, or what?
> 
> Regards,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> Tim wrote:> Thanx! tried -O0 with no luck.  Things are still out of sync.
> It
> > appears to happen only after I step into a new compilation unit.  That
> > is, in main everything is fine, but when I break or step into the next
> > compilation unit things get messed up.
> > 
> > Any other thoughts?
> > 
> > On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 09:45, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > 
> >>Tim wrote:> I have seen this with gdb console so I don't think it is a
> problem with
> >>
> >>>insight, but perhaps someone can help me.
> >>>
> >>>When I'm debugging the source code lines get out of sync with the actual
> >>>instructions.  Why is this and more importantly how do I stop it?
> >>>
> >>>Thanx!
> >>
> >>Try compiling your program without optimization...
> >>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Source lines out of sync with instructions
  2002-11-14 10:22     ` Fernando Nasser
  2002-11-14 10:37       ` Tim
@ 2002-11-14 10:39       ` Tim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tim @ 2002-11-14 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: insight

Sorry, my gdb was compiled as i386-redhat-linux.  Insight was compiled
as i686-pc-linux-gnu.


On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:22, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Can you try and run without the GUI?  If when you say step and get into your 
> subroutine you see the same problem (use the list command to print the source 
> lines or look at what was printed by gdb when it stopped -- usually a line 
> number but you may get an hex address instead/as well).
> 
> Maybe the version of GDB you are using has a problem with your architecture 
> (insight is just a GUI to the GNU debugger, which still does the actual 
> breakpoint debugging).  Is this i386, MIPS, or what?
> 
> Regards,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> Tim wrote:> Thanx! tried -O0 with no luck.  Things are still out of sync.  It
> > appears to happen only after I step into a new compilation unit.  That
> > is, in main everything is fine, but when I break or step into the next
> > compilation unit things get messed up.
> > 
> > Any other thoughts?
> > 
> > On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 09:45, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > 
> >>Tim wrote:> I have seen this with gdb console so I don't think it is a problem with
> >>
> >>>insight, but perhaps someone can help me.
> >>>
> >>>When I'm debugging the source code lines get out of sync with the actual
> >>>instructions.  Why is this and more importantly how do I stop it?
> >>>
> >>>Thanx!
> >>
> >>Try compiling your program without optimization...
> >>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Source lines out of sync with instructions
  2002-11-14 10:22     ` Fernando Nasser
@ 2002-11-14 10:37       ` Tim
  2002-11-14 10:39       ` Tim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tim @ 2002-11-14 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: insight

I tried gdb without insight, that is the command line ui, same problem. 
I am running on a i686 architecture.

The line number and source are off by 5 lines.  Can't set a break point
where I want it or step to the line I want.  For example


		... // code
	
203		if ( ch == '\r' )
204		{
205			// do something
206		}
207	}	// end of function

The if ( ch == '\r' ) line is 208, not 203.  Since the function ends at
207 there isn't anything I can do...

I've tried to use both -ggdb -O0 and -g -O0 with no difference.  The
command line gdb does the identical thing as insight.

Any help would be appreciated...


On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:22, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Can you try and run without the GUI?  If when you say step and get into your 
> subroutine you see the same problem (use the list command to print the source 
> lines or look at what was printed by gdb when it stopped -- usually a line 
> number but you may get an hex address instead/as well).
> 
> Maybe the version of GDB you are using has a problem with your architecture 
> (insight is just a GUI to the GNU debugger, which still does the actual 
> breakpoint debugging).  Is this i386, MIPS, or what?
> 
> Regards,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> Tim wrote:> Thanx! tried -O0 with no luck.  Things are still out of sync.  It
> > appears to happen only after I step into a new compilation unit.  That
> > is, in main everything is fine, but when I break or step into the next
> > compilation unit things get messed up.
> > 
> > Any other thoughts?
> > 
> > On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 09:45, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > 
> >>Tim wrote:> I have seen this with gdb console so I don't think it is a problem with
> >>
> >>>insight, but perhaps someone can help me.
> >>>
> >>>When I'm debugging the source code lines get out of sync with the actual
> >>>instructions.  Why is this and more importantly how do I stop it?
> >>>
> >>>Thanx!
> >>
> >>Try compiling your program without optimization...
> >>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* RE: Source lines out of sync with instructions
@ 2002-11-14 10:29 Rod Boyce
  2002-11-14 10:55 ` Tim
  2002-11-14 11:27 ` Tim
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rod Boyce @ 2002-11-14 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Fernando Nasser', Tim, insight

More importantly and the first thing you should try before asking question
you should do a make clean and then a make.  I find this problem is 999 out
of a 1000 is caused by dependencies not being compiled correctly after
changes to source code.  This usually means you make file is not working
correctly and cannot determine what has changed in your source.  This
includes everything from clock synchronization to not being able to write a
correct make file I have seen more bad makefiles than good makefiles.  

I would strongly suggest deleting all object files and rebuilding this
should be the first step before asking this kind of question on ANY list.


Regards,
Rod 



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fernando Nasser [mailto:fnasser@redhat.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:23 AM
To:	Tim; insight@sources.redhat.com
Subject:	Re: Source lines out of sync with instructions

Can you try and run without the GUI?  If when you say step and get into your

subroutine you see the same problem (use the list command to print the
source 
lines or look at what was printed by gdb when it stopped -- usually a line 
number but you may get an hex address instead/as well).

Maybe the version of GDB you are using has a problem with your architecture 
(insight is just a GUI to the GNU debugger, which still does the actual 
breakpoint debugging).  Is this i386, MIPS, or what?

Regards,
Fernando


Tim wrote:> Thanx! tried -O0 with no luck.  Things are still out of sync.
It
> appears to happen only after I step into a new compilation unit.  That
> is, in main everything is fine, but when I break or step into the next
> compilation unit things get messed up.
> 
> Any other thoughts?
> 
> On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 09:45, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> 
>>Tim wrote:> I have seen this with gdb console so I don't think it is a
problem with
>>
>>>insight, but perhaps someone can help me.
>>>
>>>When I'm debugging the source code lines get out of sync with the actual
>>>instructions.  Why is this and more importantly how do I stop it?
>>>
>>>Thanx!
>>
>>Try compiling your program without optimization...
>>


-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Source lines out of sync with instructions
       [not found]   ` <1037297236.1411.31.camel@TIM.DCS>
@ 2002-11-14 10:22     ` Fernando Nasser
  2002-11-14 10:37       ` Tim
  2002-11-14 10:39       ` Tim
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2002-11-14 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tim, insight

Can you try and run without the GUI?  If when you say step and get into your 
subroutine you see the same problem (use the list command to print the source 
lines or look at what was printed by gdb when it stopped -- usually a line 
number but you may get an hex address instead/as well).

Maybe the version of GDB you are using has a problem with your architecture 
(insight is just a GUI to the GNU debugger, which still does the actual 
breakpoint debugging).  Is this i386, MIPS, or what?

Regards,
Fernando


Tim wrote:> Thanx! tried -O0 with no luck.  Things are still out of sync.  It
> appears to happen only after I step into a new compilation unit.  That
> is, in main everything is fine, but when I break or step into the next
> compilation unit things get messed up.
> 
> Any other thoughts?
> 
> On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 09:45, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> 
>>Tim wrote:> I have seen this with gdb console so I don't think it is a problem with
>>
>>>insight, but perhaps someone can help me.
>>>
>>>When I'm debugging the source code lines get out of sync with the actual
>>>instructions.  Why is this and more importantly how do I stop it?
>>>
>>>Thanx!
>>
>>Try compiling your program without optimization...
>>


-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Source lines out of sync with instructions
  2002-11-14  9:40 Tim
@ 2002-11-14  9:45 ` Fernando Nasser
       [not found]   ` <1037297236.1411.31.camel@TIM.DCS>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2002-11-14  9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tim; +Cc: insight

Tim wrote:> I have seen this with gdb console so I don't think it is a problem with
> insight, but perhaps someone can help me.
> 
> When I'm debugging the source code lines get out of sync with the actual
> instructions.  Why is this and more importantly how do I stop it?
> 
> Thanx!

Try compiling your program without optimization...



-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Source lines out of sync with instructions
@ 2002-11-14  9:40 Tim
  2002-11-14  9:45 ` Fernando Nasser
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tim @ 2002-11-14  9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: insight

I have seen this with gdb console so I don't think it is a problem with
insight, but perhaps someone can help me.

When I'm debugging the source code lines get out of sync with the actual
instructions.  Why is this and more importantly how do I stop it?

Thanx!



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-14 20:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-14 12:08 Source lines out of sync with instructions Rod Boyce
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-14 10:29 Rod Boyce
2002-11-14 10:55 ` Tim
2002-11-14 11:27 ` Tim
2002-11-14  9:40 Tim
2002-11-14  9:45 ` Fernando Nasser
     [not found]   ` <1037297236.1411.31.camel@TIM.DCS>
2002-11-14 10:22     ` Fernando Nasser
2002-11-14 10:37       ` Tim
2002-11-14 10:39       ` Tim

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).