[RFA/testsuite] Update selftest.exp

[RFA/testsuite] Update selftest.exp

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

Are others seeing this failure?  If not, I'm not sure why not.  There is no
main in "main.c" any more.  It's in "gdb.c" now.

The "read" was bogus, too.  It was supposed to match a read syscall; what it
was actually matching was some debugging info that said "readline/".  We
call poll for the event loop nowadays.

Is this patch OK?  Should I also match "gdbtk-main.c" [I don't know if this
part of the testsuite is ever run on the insight binary]?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

2002-10-21  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>

	* gdb.base/selftest.exp: Update for current gdb.

Index: testsuite/gdb.base/selftest.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/selftest.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 selftest.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.base/selftest.exp	22 Jun 2002 22:19:37 -0000	1.4
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/selftest.exp	13 Oct 2002 22:55:02 -0000
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ GDB.*Copyright \[0-9\]+ Free Software Fo
     set description "backtrace through signal handler"
     send_gdb "backtrace\n"
     gdb_expect {
-	-re "#0.*read.*in main \\(.*\\) at .*main\\.c.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+	-re "#0.*(read|poll).*in main \\(.*\\) at .*gdb\\.c.*$gdb_prompt $" {
 	    pass "$description"
 	}
 	-re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {

Re: [RFA/testsuite] Update selftest.exp

[Keith Seitz]

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> Are others seeing this failure?  If not, I'm not sure why not.  There is no
> main in "main.c" any more.  It's in "gdb.c" now.

Yes, I see this failure, too.

> Should I also match "gdbtk-main.c" [I don't know if this
> part of the testsuite is ever run on the insight binary]?

I don't think it is necessary unless there is a way to use the insight 
executable with testing. Right now, I believe the testsuite will always 
run "gdb" and there is no way to change this (tool-exec doesn't seem to 
fit the bill).

Keith