* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-28 13:52 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-28 17:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-28 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-28 13:52 -------
Created an attachment (id=6998)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6998&action=view)
First line in attachment is the 73,000+ character linker command
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-28 13:52 ` [Bug libgcj/17222] " kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-28 17:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-30 18:20 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-28 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-28 17:14 -------
Actually I thought we are already doing this ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-28 13:52 ` [Bug libgcj/17222] " kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-28 17:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-30 18:20 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-30 18:37 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-30 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-30 18:20 -------
Well, to be honest libjava on darwin < 7.0 does not make much sense. You can
only use a subset of the library for very limited functionality. The big part
missing is the shared library support. For example all the SWING/AWT part you
can't use since the libgcc is statically linked in for several libraries.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-30 18:20 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-30 18:37 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
2004-08-30 19:15 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mckinlay at redhat dot com @ 2004-08-30 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-08-30 18:37 -------
Andreas, can we document the "minimum Darwin 7.x" requirement somewhere -
perhaps install.texi? Perhaps we should also set up configure to only build
libjava by default on Darwin >= 7.0.
Bryce
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-30 18:37 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
@ 2004-08-30 19:15 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-23 11:46 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-30 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-30 19:15 -------
oh, now I seem to remember why shared libraries are not supported under darwin <
7.0. Afair it was due to the missing MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR macro at the
time when I introduced the changes for shared libraries on darwin.
Now this macro is in and it should also support darwin < 7.0.
You may try to modify ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-cxx.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh and ltconfig in the
toplevel gcc dir. See where it says:
case $host_os in
darwin[1-6]*)
can_build_shared=no
;;
darwin7*)
can_build_shared=yes
;;
esac
To say yes for darwin6.x too. It may help. I don't know since I no longer have a
6.x machine around. Just an idea.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-30 19:15 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-23 11:46 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-23 12:14 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-23 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-23 11:46 -------
a) Changing the lt* scripts had no effect.
b) This problem also happens under cygwin.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-23 11:46 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-23 12:14 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-27 22:31 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-23 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |17574
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-23 12:14 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-27 22:31 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-28 17:37 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-27 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-27 22:31 -------
The original thread has a patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-09/msg01301.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-27 22:31 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-28 17:37 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-28 20:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-28 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-28 17:37 -------
The patch fixes the problem on cygwin. On its face it certainly appears that it
would also fix the problem under the older OS X versions. I recently upgraded
my iMac to OS X 10.3, so I can't test it there. Perhaps Lars could help as he
also reported the problem.
As the initiator of the PR, I would support its closing upon installation of the
patch.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lars dot sonchocky-helldorf
| |at hamburg dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-28 17:37 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-28 20:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-28 20:39 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-28 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-28 20:37 -------
Subject: Bug 17222
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: tromey@gcc.gnu.org 2004-09-28 20:37:45
Modified files:
libjava : ChangeLog Makefile.am Makefile.in
Log message:
PR libgcj/17222:
* Makefile.am (libgcj.la): Restored.
* Makefile.in: Rebuilt.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3101&r2=1.3102
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/Makefile.am.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.416&r2=1.417
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/Makefile.in.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.444&r2=1.445
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-28 20:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-28 20:39 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-28 21:22 ` lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-28 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-28 20:39 -------
Fix checked in.
Thanks Kelley.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-28 20:39 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-28 21:22 ` lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de
2004-10-09 16:08 ` lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de @ 2004-09-28 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de 2004-09-28 21:22 -------
> Perhaps Lars could help as he also reported the problem.
I'll test that by the time the next weekly snapshot of head is out.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-28 21:22 ` lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de
@ 2004-10-09 16:08 ` lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de
2005-03-02 18:25 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de @ 2004-10-09 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de 2004-10-09 16:08 -------
I successfully bootstrapped gcc-4.0-20041003 on Mac OS X 10.2.8 (powerpc-apple-darwin6.8). This
bugg seems to be fixed here too.
see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-10/msg00379.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-09 16:08 ` lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de
@ 2005-03-02 18:25 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-02 18:25 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-02 21:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-02 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 17:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=8313)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8313&action=view)
The new huge command line after the rth patch
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-02 18:25 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-02 18:25 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-02 21:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-02 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 17:25 -------
This bootstrap bug unfortunately became re-introduced with this Richard
Henderson patch which moved the command line linking the thousands of sources
directly from libgcj.la to a convenience library libgcj0_convenience_la. This
commandline happens to be 94,720 characters long which exceeds reasonable
expectations.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00402.html
This should be pretty straightforeward to fix by moving Tom Tromey's previous
clever hack to the new convenience library. I'll try that and report back the
results.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/17222] libjava fails to build due to command line length during link
2004-08-28 13:50 [Bug libgcj/17222] New: libjava fails to build due to command line length during link kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-02 18:25 ` kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-02 21:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-02 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 18:24 -------
This was filed under PR 20155.
The orginal problem was fixed but showed up again via soemthing. Next time open a new bug instead
of reopening this one.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread