public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/15735] New: Should be able to disable bytecode verification
@ 2004-05-30 16:22 rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-31 0:37 ` [Bug java/15735] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-30 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
Similar to bug-14781 for gij, gcj should also have a way
of disabling bytecode verification.
--
Summary: Should be able to disable bytecode verification
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15735
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/15735] Should be able to disable bytecode verification
2004-05-30 16:22 [Bug java/15735] New: Should be able to disable bytecode verification rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-31 0:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-31 11:50 ` rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-31 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-30 16:22 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-05-30 16:22:14
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15735
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/15735] Should be able to disable bytecode verification
2004-05-30 16:22 [Bug java/15735] New: Should be able to disable bytecode verification rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-31 0:37 ` [Bug java/15735] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-31 11:50 ` rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-28 17:15 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-31 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-31 11:49 -------
Actually, verification is no longer optional according to the JVMS as well as
the JLS (Second Edition):
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/vmspec/2nd-edition/html/ChangesAppendix.doc.html#448680
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/execution.doc.html#44490
That explains why the corresponding options are "hidden" in the JDK (at least
as of 1.4.2).
So should this be marked as WONTFIX?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15735
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/15735] Should be able to disable bytecode verification
2004-05-30 16:22 [Bug java/15735] New: Should be able to disable bytecode verification rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-31 0:37 ` [Bug java/15735] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-31 11:50 ` rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-28 17:15 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-30 16:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-25 15:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-28 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 17:14 -------
FYI, not verifying in the compiler is somewhat tricky since
the compiler relies on the verifier to create type maps it
uses later on.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15735
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/15735] Should be able to disable bytecode verification
2004-05-30 16:22 [Bug java/15735] New: Should be able to disable bytecode verification rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-28 17:15 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-30 16:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-25 15:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-30 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 16:03 -------
Hmm, maybe this should be closed as will not fix as the new verify fixes almost if not all the problems.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15735
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/15735] Should be able to disable bytecode verification
2004-05-30 16:22 [Bug java/15735] New: Should be able to disable bytecode verification rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-30 16:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-25 15:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-25 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-25 15:13 -------
I agree, I don't think we should fix this.
Instead if there are verifier bugs in the compiler, let's fix those.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15735
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-25 15:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-30 16:22 [Bug java/15735] New: Should be able to disable bytecode verification rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-31 0:37 ` [Bug java/15735] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-31 11:50 ` rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-28 17:15 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-30 16:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-25 15:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).