public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/20294] New: ia64 gcj failures
@ 2005-03-03 17:31 overholt at redhat dot com
2005-03-03 17:32 ` [Bug target/20294] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-04 15:38 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: overholt at redhat dot com @ 2005-03-03 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
While trying to compile jdtcore.jar (from Eclipse) with indirect-dispatch, I get
a tonne of what appear to be assembler errors:
/tmp/ccszj3q5.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccszj3q5.s:156410: Error: instruction address is not a multiple of 16
My compilation attempt:
$ gcj -fPIC -fjni -findirect-dispatch -shared -Wl,Bsymbolic -o jdtcore.jar.so \
jdtcore.jar
I've uploaded a copy of jdtcore.jar (built by itself (ecj)) to here:
http://overholt.ca/jdtcore.jar
$ gcj --version
gcj (GCC) 4.1.0 20050302 (experimental)
--
Summary: ia64 gcj failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: overholt at redhat dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug target/20294] ia64 gcj failures 2005-03-03 17:31 [Bug java/20294] New: ia64 gcj failures overholt at redhat dot com @ 2005-03-03 17:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-04 15:38 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-03 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-03 02:43 ------- This is a target bug. Either a binutils one which I really doubt it, or a back-end bug which looks more likely. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Component|java |target http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/20294] ia64 gcj failures 2005-03-03 17:31 [Bug java/20294] New: ia64 gcj failures overholt at redhat dot com 2005-03-03 17:32 ` [Bug target/20294] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-04 15:38 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-04 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu | |dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-20294-9773@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug target/20294] ia64 gcj failures [not found] <bug-20294-9773@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2006-01-17 1:20 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 1:38 ` overholt at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-17 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 01:20 ------- Andrew, is this still happening with 4.1? -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/20294] ia64 gcj failures [not found] <bug-20294-9773@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2006-01-17 1:20 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-17 1:38 ` overholt at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: overholt at redhat dot com @ 2006-01-17 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Comment #3 from overholt at redhat dot com 2006-01-17 01:38 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Andrew, is this still happening with 4.1? No. Sorry I didn't close this already. I successfully built Eclipse (natively-compiled) on ia64 last week. Marking WORKSFORME. -- overholt at redhat dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-17 1:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-03 17:31 [Bug java/20294] New: ia64 gcj failures overholt at redhat dot com
2005-03-03 17:32 ` [Bug target/20294] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-04 15:38 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-20294-9773@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-01-17 1:20 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-17 1:38 ` overholt at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).