public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor
[not found] <20030119181601.9369.jsturm@one-point.com>
@ 2005-02-10 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-12 2:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-10 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 00:26 -------
*** Bug 19870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9369
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor
[not found] <20030119181601.9369.jsturm@one-point.com>
2005-02-10 0:28 ` [Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-12 2:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-13 23:27 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-30 13:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-12 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-12 02:03 -------
Hmm, even though GCJ -C produces the same bytecode for Outer as far as I can see, we now produce
something which actually works with both gij and java (with -Xfuture).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9369
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor
[not found] <20030119181601.9369.jsturm@one-point.com>
2005-02-10 0:28 ` [Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-12 2:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-13 23:27 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-30 13:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-13 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-13 23:27 -------
This no longer fails due to a change that went in as part of the fix
for PR 8618. In particular, we now emit the 'Inner' constructor as
package-private, not private.
This is kind of a slacker approach to implementing accessors.
For constructors and static methods it probably has the desired
effect without doing harm, though I haven't considered it in great
detail. For ordinary methods it might be a problem due to overriding.
This PR should only be marked as "fixed" if there is another PR for the
case of accessors for methods and fields. Even then it isn't entirely
clear if this is more hack or more fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9369
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor
[not found] <20030119181601.9369.jsturm@one-point.com>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-13 23:27 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-30 13:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-30 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |minor
Last reconfirmed|2004-05-20 23:41:11 |2005-09-30 13:33:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9369
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor
[not found] <bug-9369-447@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2007-01-09 20:46 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-09 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 -------
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9369
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-09 20:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20030119181601.9369.jsturm@one-point.com>
2005-02-10 0:28 ` [Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-12 2:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-13 23:27 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-30 13:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-9369-447@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-01-09 20:46 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).