public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcj/38396] [4.4 Regression] libgcj_bc for 4.3 and 4.4 are binary incompatible but have the same SONAME
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081210110300.13736.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-38396-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 11:03 -------
Are you sure? My Debian system agrees with me:
ls -l /usr/lib/libgcj_bc.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2008-10-01 20:38 /usr/lib/libgcj_bc.so.1 ->
libgcj.so.90
Are the different libgcj not supposed to provide the same indirect dispatch
ABI for all versions?
btw, how does this affect link-time?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38396
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-10 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-04 12:08 [Bug libgcj/38396] New: " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 10:35 ` [Bug libgcj/38396] [4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 10:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 11:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2008-12-10 11:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 11:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 11:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 11:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 11:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 11:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 11:32 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 11:32 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 12:17 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 12:33 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2008-12-10 12:46 ` aph at redhat dot com
2008-12-10 13:14 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2008-12-10 13:26 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 13:46 ` aph at redhat dot com
2008-12-10 14:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 14:29 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-19 14:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-19 15:02 ` [Bug libgcj/38396] [4.3 Regression] ecj1 linked against both -lgcj and -lgcj_bc jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-08 22:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-11 8:30 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-01-12 17:36 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-24 10:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-04 21:01 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-04-04 21:13 ` aph at redhat dot com
2009-04-04 21:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-06-25 12:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-25 12:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081210110300.13736.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=java-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).