public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcj/10353] Java testsuite failures
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081211124429.29954.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-10353-222@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #33 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-11 12:44 -------
> Eric, you would "add a blurb about that in the platform-specific installation
> notes" (comment #25). Did that happen?
No, it didn't, IIRC I wasn't sure of my analysis at all.
> What do you, as a SPARC port maintainer, think what should happen with
> this bug?
WONTFIX seems appropriate, there has been essentially zero interest from the
SPARC or the Java maintainers for the Java compiler on SPARC/Solaris, ever.
Let's just wait for PR from users of this compiler, if any.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Keywords|wrong-code |
Resolution| |WONTFIX
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] |Java testsuite failures
|Java testsuite failures |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-11 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-10353-222@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-16 21:47 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:03 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-29 17:07 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28 20:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-06 11:30 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2006-05-06 11:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-25 2:42 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:26 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-22 8:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 16:29 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 23:18 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 23:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-11 1:10 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-11 12:44 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081211124429.29954.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=java-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).