public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libgcj/33764] [4.3 regression] gij is built as 32-bit binary when building multilib gcc [not found] <bug-33764-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2011-06-27 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33764 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.0 --- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 11:15:44 UTC --- Fixed for 4.4.0. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/33764] New: [4.3 regression] gij is built as 32-bit binary when building multilib gcc
@ 2007-10-13 19:35 bero at arklinux dot org
2009-03-31 20:13 ` [Bug libgcj/33764] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bero at arklinux dot org @ 2007-10-13 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
When building gcc on x86_64 with multilib support, gij is built as 32-bit
executable with some strange -rpaths.
The other parts of gcj are ok.
[bero@c64 ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/gcj
libmpfr.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libmpfr.so.1 (0x00002b0221bea000)
libgmp.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libgmp.so.3 (0x00002b0221e20000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002b022205e000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00002b02219ce000)
[bero@c64 ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/gij
(0xffffe000)
libgij.so.9 => /usr/lib64/../lib/libgij.so.9 (0xf7f03000)
libgcj.so.9 => /usr/lib64/../lib/libgcj.so.9 (0xf5fea000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf5fd2000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xf5fca000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xf5fc6000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib64/../lib/libz.so.1 (0xf5fb3000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib64/../lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf5fa6000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xf5f7f000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x42000000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xf7f07000)
--
Summary: [4.3 regression] gij is built as 32-bit binary when
building multilib gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bero at arklinux dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33764
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/33764] [4.3 regression] gij is built as 32-bit binary when building multilib gcc 2007-10-13 19:35 [Bug java/33764] New: " bero at arklinux dot org @ 2009-03-31 20:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Comment #11 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 20:13 ------- Closing 4.2 branch. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[4.2/4.3 regression] gij is |[4.3 regression] gij is |built as 32-bit binary when |built as 32-bit binary when |building multilib gcc |building multilib gcc Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33764 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/33764] [4.3 regression] gij is built as 32-bit binary when building multilib gcc 2007-10-13 19:35 [Bug java/33764] New: " bero at arklinux dot org 2009-03-31 20:13 ` [Bug libgcj/33764] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:28 ------- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33764 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/33764] [4.3 regression] gij is built as 32-bit binary when building multilib gcc 2007-10-13 19:35 [Bug java/33764] New: " bero at arklinux dot org 2009-03-31 20:13 ` [Bug libgcj/33764] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:11 ------- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33764 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-27 11:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-33764-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-06-27 11:19 ` [Bug libgcj/33764] [4.3 regression] gij is built as 32-bit binary when building multilib gcc rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2007-10-13 19:35 [Bug java/33764] New: " bero at arklinux dot org
2009-03-31 20:13 ` [Bug libgcj/33764] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).