public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libgcj/46774] New: [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager
@ 2010-12-03 0:35 gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
2010-12-03 0:35 ` [Bug libgcj/46774] " gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org @ 2010-12-03 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46774
Summary: [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy
object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: gnu_andrew@member.fsf.org
VMAccessController creates PermissionDomain objects with the two-argument
constructor, with the result that the default SecurityManager does not check
the system policy. See PR46773 for more details.
gcj has a local copy of this class so a separate fix is required to that for
GNU Classpath.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/46774] [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager
2010-12-03 0:35 [Bug libgcj/46774] New: [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
@ 2010-12-03 0:35 ` gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
2010-12-16 19:48 ` gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org @ 2010-12-03 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46774
Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |46773
--- Comment #1 from Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org> 2010-12-03 00:35:09 UTC ---
Add metabug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/46774] [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager
2010-12-03 0:35 [Bug libgcj/46774] New: [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
2010-12-03 0:35 ` [Bug libgcj/46774] " gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
@ 2010-12-16 19:48 ` gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-20 18:20 ` gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-20 18:32 ` gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-16 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46774
--- Comment #2 from gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org <gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-16 19:48:12 UTC ---
Author: gandalf
Date: Thu Dec 16 19:48:07 2010
New Revision: 167952
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167952
Log:
PR libgcj/46774: Create dynamic ProtectionDomain instances which check the
system policy.
2010-12-13 Andrew John Hughes <ahughes@redhat.com>
PR libgcj/46774
* libjava/java/security/VMAccessController.java:
(DEFAULT_CONTEXT): Create ProtectionDomain with
four argument constructor (arguments are the same
as those implied by the two argument constructor).
(getContext()): Create ProtectionDomain instances
with four argument constructor using a null Principal
array (as before) but including the classloader, which
was always null before.
Modified:
trunk/libjava/ChangeLog
trunk/libjava/classpath/lib/java/security/VMAccessController.class
trunk/libjava/java/security/VMAccessController.java
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/46774] [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager
2010-12-03 0:35 [Bug libgcj/46774] New: [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
2010-12-03 0:35 ` [Bug libgcj/46774] " gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
2010-12-16 19:48 ` gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-20 18:20 ` gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-20 18:32 ` gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-20 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46774
--- Comment #3 from gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org <gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-20 18:19:57 UTC ---
Author: gandalf
Date: Mon Dec 20 18:19:52 2010
New Revision: 168092
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168092
Log:
PR libgcj/46774: Create dynamic ProtectionDomain instances which check the
system policy.
2010-12-13 Andrew John Hughes <ahughes@redhat.com>
PR libgcj/46774
* libjava/java/security/VMAccessController.java:
(DEFAULT_CONTEXT): Create ProtectionDomain with
four argument constructor (arguments are the same
as those implied by the two argument constructor).
(getContext()): Create ProtectionDomain instances
with four argument constructor using a null Principal
array (as before) but including the classloader, which
was always null before.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libjava/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libjava/classpath/lib/java/security/VMAccessController.class
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libjava/java/security/VMAccessController.java
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/46774] [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager
2010-12-03 0:35 [Bug libgcj/46774] New: [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-20 18:20 ` gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-20 18:32 ` gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org @ 2010-12-20 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46774
Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|4.6.0 |4.5.1
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
--- Comment #4 from Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org> 2010-12-20 18:32:25 UTC ---
Fixed in trunk and 4.5 branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-20 18:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-03 0:35 [Bug libgcj/46774] New: [gcj] Calling Policy.setPolicy with a new Policy object has no effect on the DefaultSecurityManager gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
2010-12-03 0:35 ` [Bug libgcj/46774] " gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
2010-12-16 19:48 ` gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-20 18:20 ` gandalf at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-20 18:32 ` gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).