public inbox for java@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	rguenther@suse.de, joseph@codesourcery.com, jason@redhat.com,
	java@gcc.gnu.org, ian@airs.com,
	Olivier Hainque <hainque@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010130903.00490.ebotcazou@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CB4E841.1090308@redhat.com>

> The driver for this patch is SEH, which will add yet another function
> name variant in each of these places in each front end.  While I could
> adjust each language appropriately, it seems to me that it is a bit
> cleaner to centralize this knowledge.

-/* Build a decl for a EH personality function named NAME. */
+/* Build a personality function given a language.  LANG is really an
+   enum dwarf_source_language.  */

Left-overs from when it was only an integer?


+    case DW_LANG_Ada83:
+    case DW_LANG_Ada95:
+      prefix = "__gnat_eh_personality";
+      /* The GNAT folk did not follow the standard naming format.
+	 That can change if we ever have to increment the version.  */
+      if (ui == UI_DWARF2 || ui == UI_TARGET)
+	unwind = "";
+      version = "";
+      break;

Let's change that right now, we don't guarantee any ABI compatibility between 
different major releases.  Olivier, any objections?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-13  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-12 22:59 Richard Henderson
2010-10-13  1:11 ` Jason Merrill
2010-10-13  4:58 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-10-13  7:04 ` Eric Botcazou [this message]
2010-10-13  7:09   ` Arnaud Charlet
2010-10-13  7:23   ` Olivier Hainque
2010-10-13  8:53 ` Andrew Haley
2010-10-13 14:14 ` Mark Mitchell
2010-10-13 18:07 ` Richard Henderson
2010-10-13 18:12   ` Eric Botcazou
2010-10-13 18:26     ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201010130903.00490.ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --to=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hainque@adacore.com \
    --cc=ian@airs.com \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).