From: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Java <java@gcc.gnu.org>,
Nicola Pero <nicola.pero@meta-innovation.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9180F5.3050203@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109131348.13087.paul@codesourcery.com>
This did break libobjc and libjava on arm-linux-gnueabi.
libobjc now has an undefined reference to _Unwind_decode_target2, which can be
avoided with
--- libobjc/exception.c.orig 2011-07-21 15:33:57.000000000 +0000
+++ libobjc/exception.c 2011-10-09 10:53:12.554940776 +0000
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
_Unwind_Ptr ptr;
ptr = (_Unwind_Ptr) (info->TType - (i * 4));
- ptr = _Unwind_decode_target2 (ptr);
+ ptr = _Unwind_decode_typeinfo_ptr (info->ttype_base, (_Unwind_Word) ptr);
/* NULL ptr means catch-all. Note that if the class is not found,
this will abort the program. */
libjava fails to build, the same change doesn't work for libjava/exception.cc,
because the struct lsda_header_info in exception.cc is missing the ttype_base
member. Any suggestions?
On 09/13/2011 02:48 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
>> C6X uses an unwinding/exception handling echeme very similar to that
>> defined by the ARM EABI. The core of the unwinder is the same, so I've
>> pulled it out into a common file.
>>
>> Other than the obvious target specific bits, the main compiler visible
>> difference is that the C6X assembler generates the unwinding tables from
>> DWARF .cfi directives, rather than the separate set of directives used by
>> the ARM assembler.
>>
>> The libstdc++ changes probably deserve a bit of explanation. The ttype_base
>> field was clearly used in an early draft of the ARM EABI, and the current
>> ARM definition is a compatible subset of that used by C6X.
>> _GLIBCXX_OVERRIDE_TTYPE_ENCODING is an unfortunate hack because when doing
>> the ARM implementation I failed to realise ttype_encoding was the same
>> thing as R_ARM_TARGET2. We now have a lot of ARM binaries floating around
>> with that field set incorrectly, so it's either this or an ABI bump.
>
> I've updated the patch to accomodate the move to libgcc/, done a quick sanity
> recheck of arm-linux and c6x-elf and applied to svn.
>
> P.S. in case it's not clear from my description, the libstdc++ changes aren't
> really a new hack, it's just making an old one more obvious.
>
> Paul
>
> 2011-09-13 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
>
> gcc/
> * config/arm/arm.h (ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT): Define.
> (ARM_TARGET2_DWARF_FORMAT): Provide default definition.
> * config/arm/linux-eabi.h (ARM_TARGET2_DWARF_FORMAT): Define.
> * config/arm/symbian.h (ARM_TARGET2_DWARF_FORMAT): Define.
> * config/arm/uclinux-eabi.h(ARM_TARGET2_DWARF_FORMAT): Define.
> * config/arm/t-bpabi (EXTRA_HEADERS): Add unwind-arm-common.h.
> * config/arm/t-symbian (EXTRA_HEADERS): Add unwind-arm-common.h.
> * config/c6x/c6x.c (c6x_output_file_unwind): Don't rely on dwarf2 code
> enabling unwind tables.
> (c6x_debug_unwind_info): New function.
> (TARGET_ARM_EABI_UNWINDER): Define.
> (TARGET_DEBUG_UNWIND_INFO): Define.
> * config/c6x/c6x.h (DWARF_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN): Define.
> (TARGET_EXTRA_CFI_SECTION): Remove.
> * config/c6x/t-c6x-elf (EXTRA_HEADERS): Set.
> * ginclude/unwind-arm-common.h: New file.
>
> libgcc/
> * config.host (tic6x-*-*): Add c6x/t-c6x-elf. Set unwind_header.
> * unwind-c.c (PERSONALITY_FUNCTION): Use UNWIND_POINTER_REG.
> * unwind-arm-common.inc: New file.
> * config/arm/unwind-arm.c: Use unwind-arm-common.inc.
> * config/arm/unwind-arm.h: Use unwind-arm-common.h.
> (_GLIBCXX_OVERRIDE_TTYPE_ENCODING): Define.
> * config/c6x/libunwind.S: New file.
> * config/c6x/pr-support.c: New file.
> * config/c6x/unwind-c6x.c: New file.
> * config/c6x/unwind-c6x.h: New file.
> * config/c6x/t-c6x-elf: New file.
>
>
> libstdc++-v3/
> * libsupc++/eh_arm.cc (__cxa_end_cleanup): Add C6X implementation.
> * libsupc++/eh_call.cc (__cxa_call_unexpected): Set rtti_base.
> * libsupc++/eh_personality.cc (NO_SIZE_OF_ENCODED_VALUE): Remove
> __ARM_EABI_UNWINDER__ check.
> (parse_lsda_header): Check _GLIBCXX_OVERRIDE_TTYPE_ENCODING.
> (get_ttype_entry): Use generic implementation on ARM EABI.
> (check_exception_spec): Use _Unwind_decode_typeinfo_ptr and
> UNWIND_STACK_REG.
> (PERSONALITY_FUNCTION): Set ttype_base.
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-09 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201108041531.58790.paul@codesourcery.com>
[not found] ` <201109131348.13087.paul@codesourcery.com>
2011-10-09 11:10 ` Matthias Klose [this message]
2011-10-10 10:33 ` Andrew Haley
2011-10-10 11:27 ` Matthias Klose
2011-10-10 12:23 ` Paul Brook
2011-10-17 11:01 ` Matthias Klose
2011-10-17 11:21 ` Andrew Haley
2011-10-17 11:27 ` Matthias Klose
2011-10-17 13:49 ` Paul Brook
2011-10-17 14:11 ` Nicola Pero
2011-10-20 12:29 ` Bernd Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9180F5.3050203@ubuntu.com \
--to=doko@ubuntu.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nicola.pero@meta-innovation.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).