Re: [patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling

[Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>]

On 10/17/2011 12:01 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 02:23 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
>>> Index: libjava/exception.cc
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- libjava/exception.cc	(revision 179739)
>>> +++ libjava/exception.cc	(working copy)
>>> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@
>>>  {
>>>    _Unwind_Ptr Start;
>>>    _Unwind_Ptr LPStart;
>>> +  _Unwind_Ptr ttype_base;
>>>    const unsigned char *TType;
>>>    const unsigned char *action_table;
>>>    unsigned char ttype_encoding;
>>> @@ -184,7 +185,7 @@
>>>    _Unwind_Ptr ptr;
>>>
>>>    ptr = (_Unwind_Ptr) (info->TType - (i * 4));
>>> -  ptr = _Unwind_decode_target2(ptr);
>>> +  ptr = _Unwind_decode_typeinfo_ptr (info->ttype_base, (_Unwind_Word)
>>> ptr);
>>>
>>>    return reinterpret_cast<void **>(ptr);
>>>  }
>>> @@ -325,6 +326,7 @@
>>>
>>>    // Parse the LSDA header.
>>>    p = parse_lsda_header (context, language_specific_data, &info);
>>> +  info.ttype_base = base_of_encoded_value (info.ttype_encoding, context);
>>>  #ifdef HAVE_GETIPINFO
>>>    ip = _Unwind_GetIPInfo (context, &ip_before_insn);
>>>  #else
>>
>> No.  The purpose of my patch was to remove the arm specific code.
>>
>> The only difference I can see in this bit of code is that libstdc++ uses 
>> base_of_encoded_value/read_encoded_value_with_base whereas libjava uses 
>> context/read_encoded_value.
>>
>> I expect you want something like the patch below (completely untested).
> 
> I checked the attached patch, test results at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/msg01377.html
> 
> which are the same as with my suggested patch.
> 
> Ok for the trunk?

OK.  One question: where is_GLIBCXX_OVERRIDE_TTYPE_ENCODING defined?

Andrew.