public inbox for java@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Groeneveld <erik@cq2.nl>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GC leaks debugging
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:50:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=3oDzGN-GkWOcQfiESZoyxCCnntg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9993D4.9040704@redhat.com>

[...]
>> Any real program produces so much blacklist messages that it hardly
>> runs.  I'd like to investigate this or am I on the wrong track
>> completely?
>
> I think you are.  The heap is small in this simple test case, so there
> are no real problems.

I will ignore this for now then.

> You need to find out what the real problem is.  Find just one of those
> "need to allocate large block" messages, and find out why it is being
> called.  I suspect that there is an actual bug that is causing the
> explosion and it can be found.  Forget about 991 blacklist messages:
> not useful.

I have done many tests, with different programs, which all run
flawlessly on OpenJDK, but explode on GCJ.  I have run some test last
night, and I'll see from the logs that the heap is 1 GB, while about
700 MB of it is free.  Also it seems that the finalization table keeps
growing.  I am running now, but later this day I'll post the log. (And
search the mail archives with a new keyword: finalization ;-)

> I'd have a look myself, but there is no way to duplicate your problem.
> BTW, is this on a 32-bit or 64-bit platform?

It is on 32-bit. On 64 bit, the blacklisting is not happening.  But
the heap keeps exploding, so you are right, the problem probably lies
elsewhere.
(Although I still feel sorry for the poor GC on 32 bit systems ;-)

Thanks a lot.
Erik

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-05  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-01  8:39 Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-01  8:45 ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-01  9:03   ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-01  9:34     ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-02  0:27       ` Boehm, Hans
2011-04-02  9:39         ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-03 17:15           ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-03 18:00             ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-04  8:13               ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-04  8:53                 ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-04  9:48                   ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-05  4:44                     ` Boehm, Hans
2011-04-05  8:58                       ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-05  6:50                     ` Erik Groeneveld [this message]
2011-04-05  9:02                       ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-05 12:02                         ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-05 12:55                           ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-06 14:30                             ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-06 18:33                               ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-06 18:39                                 ` David Daney
2011-04-07 17:43                                 ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-08  8:12                                   ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-08 13:56                                   ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-08 15:35                                     ` David Daney
2011-04-08 15:53                                       ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-08 15:57                                         ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-08 15:48                                     ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-09  1:17                                     ` Boehm, Hans
2011-04-09  8:47                                       ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-09 10:56                                       ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-10 11:03                                         ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-12 18:43                                           ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-13  8:11                                             ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-13 12:11                                               ` Bryce McKinlay
2011-04-13 14:27                                                 ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-14  8:36                                               ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-14  8:43                                                 ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-14 10:02                                                   ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-14 10:50                                                     ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-15  7:32                                                       ` Erik J Groeneveld
2011-04-01 17:41 ` David Daney
2011-04-02 16:21   ` Erik Groeneveld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTi=3oDzGN-GkWOcQfiESZoyxCCnntg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=erik@cq2.nl \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).