public inbox for java@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryce McKinlay <bmckinlay@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: Erik Groeneveld <erik@cq2.nl>, "Boehm, Hans" <hans.boehm@hp.com>,
		"java@gcc.gnu.org" <java@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GC leaks debugging
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimRd_BzxgrxLh1xLMn6=PB4asUUNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA55ABC.1040505@redhat.com>

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/04/11 19:42, Erik Groeneveld wrote:

>> Meanwhile, I'd like to pursue a better solution - less of a hack.  Any
>> interest in helping out?
>
> Before you go any further, it's worth remembering that you're using an
> old version of the GC.  I've been told that "Of course, [the new gc]
> will require modification of boehm.cc in GCJ" but not why.
>
> It looks like you're making progress, but I urge you to move to the
> new gc or your time may be wasted on the old one.

Now would certainly be a good time to work on a boehm-gc import, with
GCC in stage 1.

Note that Kai Tietz has recently expressed interest in working on this, too:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-04/msg00006.html

"svn import" and "svn merge" are your friends here. The unmodified
upstream sources from the last time we merged are tagged as GC_6_6.
IIRC, the local modifications at that time were fairly minimal, mostly
just configure changes. If you import the current sources with a
similar tag, it'll make it easy to get a diff of the GCC tree's
current divergences, which can then be submitted upstream if
appropriate.

Bryce

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-13 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-01  8:39 Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-01  8:45 ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-01  9:03   ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-01  9:34     ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-02  0:27       ` Boehm, Hans
2011-04-02  9:39         ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-03 17:15           ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-03 18:00             ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-04  8:13               ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-04  8:53                 ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-04  9:48                   ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-05  4:44                     ` Boehm, Hans
2011-04-05  8:58                       ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-05  6:50                     ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-05  9:02                       ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-05 12:02                         ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-05 12:55                           ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-06 14:30                             ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-06 18:33                               ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-06 18:39                                 ` David Daney
2011-04-07 17:43                                 ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-08  8:12                                   ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-08 13:56                                   ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-08 15:35                                     ` David Daney
2011-04-08 15:53                                       ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-08 15:57                                         ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-08 15:48                                     ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-09  1:17                                     ` Boehm, Hans
2011-04-09  8:47                                       ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-09 10:56                                       ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-10 11:03                                         ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-12 18:43                                           ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-13  8:11                                             ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-13 12:11                                               ` Bryce McKinlay [this message]
2011-04-13 14:27                                                 ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-14  8:36                                               ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-14  8:43                                                 ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-14 10:02                                                   ` Erik Groeneveld
2011-04-14 10:50                                                     ` Andrew Haley
2011-04-15  7:32                                                       ` Erik J Groeneveld
2011-04-01 17:41 ` David Daney
2011-04-02 16:21   ` Erik Groeneveld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTimRd_BzxgrxLh1xLMn6=PB4asUUNw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bmckinlay@gmail.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=erik@cq2.nl \
    --cc=hans.boehm@hp.com \
    --cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).