* gcj for j2me
@ 2010-04-21 21:50 Monty Hall
2010-04-21 22:11 ` Joel Dice
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Monty Hall @ 2010-04-21 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java
Anybody had success compiling j2me code w/ gcj? I've noticed that javac
doesn't do a stellar job doing compile time optimization and that very
limited mobile device jvm's pretty much don't do optimization. Would be
handy to do compile time optimizations for mobile devices. Any pointers
appreciated.
Monty
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: gcj for j2me
2010-04-21 21:50 gcj for j2me Monty Hall
@ 2010-04-21 22:11 ` Joel Dice
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joel Dice @ 2010-04-21 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Monty Hall; +Cc: java
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Monty Hall wrote:
> Anybody had success compiling j2me code w/ gcj? I've noticed that javac
> doesn't do a stellar job doing compile time optimization and that very
> limited mobile device jvm's pretty much don't do optimization. Would be
> handy to do compile time optimizations for mobile devices. Any pointers
> appreciated.
ProGuard (http://proguard.sourceforge.net) does static bytecode
optimization, including some pretty impressive whole-program optimizations
like devirtualization and inlining across interface calls. That might be
the easiest solution if your target device already has a VM.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-21 22:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-21 21:50 gcj for j2me Monty Hall
2010-04-21 22:11 ` Joel Dice
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).