From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>,
Antoni Boucher <bouanto@zoho.com>,
jit@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgccjit Fix a RTL bug for libgccjit
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:38:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c86682b-9e80-4d15-9692-d011129d1cbe@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80b6dae50b4011b6a6a6b36da8555937fa0f4de7.camel@redhat.com>
On 11/20/23 15:46, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 14:09 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/17/23 14:08, Antoni Boucher wrote:
>>> In contrast with the other frontends, libgccjit can be executed
>>> multiple times in a row in the same process.
>> Yup. I'm aware of that. Even so calling init_emit_once more than
>> one
>> time still seems wrong.
>
> There are two approaches we follow when dealing with state stored in
> global variables:
> (a) clean it all up via the various functions called from
> toplev::finalize
> (b) make it effectively constant once initialized, with idempotent
> initialization
>
> The multiple in-process executions of libgccjit could pass in different
> code-generation options. Does the RTL-initialization logic depend
> anywhere on flags passed in, because if so, we're probably going to
> need to re-run the initialization.
The INIT_EXPANDERS code would be the most concerning as it's
implementation is totally hidden and provided by the target. I wouldn't
be at all surprised if one or more do something evil in there. That
probably needs to be evaluated on a target by target basis.
The rest really do look like single init, even in a JIT environment
kinds of things -- ie all the shared constants in RTL.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-16 22:36 Antoni Boucher
2023-11-17 21:06 ` Jeff Law
2023-11-17 21:08 ` Antoni Boucher
2023-11-17 21:09 ` Jeff Law
2023-11-20 22:46 ` David Malcolm
2023-11-20 23:38 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-11-20 23:54 ` David Malcolm
2023-12-11 16:06 ` Jeff Law
2024-01-10 14:47 ` David Malcolm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c86682b-9e80-4d15-9692-d011129d1cbe@gmail.com \
--to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=bouanto@zoho.com \
--cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jit@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).