public inbox for kawa@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* macro error: ... follows template with no suitably-nested pattern variable
@ 2023-10-06 22:01 Damien Mattei
  2023-10-07  7:53 ` Damien Mattei
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Damien Mattei @ 2023-10-06 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kawa mailing list

hello,

this macro seems not valid for kawa but is right with Racket and Guile:



(define-syntax <+
  (syntax-rules ()

    ((_ (var1 ...) expr) (begin
               (define-values (var1 ...) expr)
               (values var1 ...)))
    ;; (begin
    ;;   (define var1 '())
    ;;   ...
    ;;   ;;(display "<+ multiple") (newline)
    ;;   (set!-values (var1 ...) expr)))

    ;; > {(x y z) <+ (u v w) <+ (a b c)  <+ (values 2 4 5)}
    ;; 2
    ;; 4
    ;; 5
    ;; > (list x y z u v w a b c)
    ;; '(2 4 5 2 4 5 2 4 5)
    ((_ (var10 ...) (var11 ...) ... expr) (begin  ;; i do not do what
the syntax says (assignation not in the good order) but it gives the
same result
                        (define-values (var10 ...) expr)
                        (define-values (var11 ...) (values var10 ...))
                        ...
                        (values var10 ...)))

    ((_ var expr) (begin
            (define var expr)
            var))

     ;; > { y <+ z <+ 7 }
     ;; 7
     ;; > z
     ;; 7
     ;; > y
     ;; 7
     ;; > { x <+ y <+ z <+ 7 }
     ;; 7
     ;; > (list x y z)
     ;; '(7 7 7)
     ((_ var var1 ... expr) (begin ;; i do not do what the syntax says
(assignation not in the good order) but it gives the same result
                  (define var expr)
                  (define var1 var)
                  ...
                  var))

     ))

error:

... follows template with no suitably-nested pattern variable

the error is located on the second pattern:

((_ (var10 ...) (var11 ...) ... expr) (begin  ;; i do not do what the
syntax says (assignation not in the good order) but it gives the same
result
                        (define-values (var10 ...) expr)
                        (define-values (var11 ...) (values var10 ...))
                        ...
                        (values var10 ...)))

i had a few doubt long ago about multiple ... use but it worked well
with other scheme.

Damien

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: macro error: ... follows template with no suitably-nested pattern variable
  2023-10-06 22:01 macro error: ... follows template with no suitably-nested pattern variable Damien Mattei
@ 2023-10-07  7:53 ` Damien Mattei
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Damien Mattei @ 2023-10-07  7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kawa mailing list

this solution works:

;; scheme@(guile-user)> (def (foo) (when #t (return "hello") "bye"))
;; scheme@(guile-user)> (foo)
;;  "hello"

;; (def x)



;; (def (foo n)
;;      (cond ((= n 0) 'end0)
;;        ((= n 7) (return 'end7))
;;        (else (cons n (foo {n - 1})))))


;; scheme@(guile-user)> (foo 5)
;; (5 4 3 2 1 . end0)
;; scheme@(guile-user)> (foo 10)
;; (10 9 8 . end7)

;; (def (bar n)
;;      (cond ((= n 0) 'end0)
;;        ((= n 7) (return-rec 'end7))
;;        (else (cons n (bar {n - 1})))))

;; scheme@(guile-user)> (bar 5)
;; $4 = (5 4 3 2 1 . end0)
;; scheme@(guile-user)> (bar 10)
;; $5 = end7
(define-syntax def

  (lambda (stx)

      (syntax-case stx ()

    ;; multiple definitions without values assigned
    ;; (def (x y z))
    ((_ (var1 ...)) #`(begin (define var1 '()) ...))

    ;;  (def (foo) (when #t (return "hello") "bye"))
        ;; ((_ (<name> <arg> ...) <body> <body>* ...)
        ;;  (let ((ret-id (datum->syntax stx 'return)))
        ;;    #`(define (<name> <arg> ...)
    ;;        (call/cc (lambda (#,ret-id) <body> <body>* ...)))))


    ((_ (<name> <arg> ...) <body> <body>* ...)

         (let ((ret-id (datum->syntax stx 'return))
           (ret-rec-id (datum->syntax stx 'return-rec)))

       #`(define (<name> <arg> ...)

           (call/cc (lambda (#,ret-rec-id)

             (apply (rec <name> (lambda (<arg> ...)
                          (call/cc (lambda (#,ret-id) <body> <body>*
...)))) (list <arg> ...)))))))




    ;; single definition without a value assigned
    ;; (def x)
    ((_ var) #`(define var '()))

    ;; (def x 7)
    ((_ var expr) #`(define var expr))

    ((_ err ...) #`(syntax-error "Bad def form"))

    )))



;; definition and assignment
;; { x <+ 7 } is equivalent to : (<- x 7) or (define x 7)

;; > {(a b c) <+ (values 7 8 9)}
;; 7
;; 8
;; 9
;; > (list a b c)
;; '(7 8 9)

;; > { y <+ z <+ 7 }
;; > z
;; 7
;; > y
;; 7
;; > { x <+ y <+ z <+ 7 }
;; > (list x y z)
;; '(7 7 7)

;; > {(x y z) <+ (u v w) <+ (a b c)  <+ (values 2 4 5)}
;; 2
;; 4
;; 5
;; > (list x y z u v w a b c)
;; '(2 4 5 2 4 5 2 4 5)
(define-syntax <+
  (syntax-rules ()

    ((_ (var1 ...) expr) (begin
               (define-values (var1 ...) expr)
               (values var1 ...)))
    ;; (begin
    ;;   (define var1 '())
    ;;   ...
    ;;   ;;(display "<+ multiple") (newline)
    ;;   (set!-values (var1 ...) expr)))

    ;; > {(x y z) <+ (u v w) <+ (a b c)  <+ (values 2 4 5)}
    ;; 2
    ;; 4
    ;; 5
    ;; > (list x y z u v w a b c)
    ;; '(2 4 5 2 4 5 2 4 5)
    ;; ((_ (var10 ...) (var11 ...) ... expr) (begin  ;; i do not do
what the syntax says (assignation not in the good order) but it gives
the same result
    ;;                         (define-values (var10 ...) expr)
    ;;                         (define-values (var11 ...) (values var10 ...))
    ;;                         ...
    ;;                         (values var10 ...)))


     ((_ (var10 ...)  ... expr)
                              (begin
                            (define-values (var10 ...) expr)
                            ...
                              expr))


    ((_ var expr) (begin
            (define var expr)
            var))

     ;; > { y <+ z <+ 7 }
     ;; 7
     ;; > z
     ;; 7
     ;; > y
     ;; 7
     ;; > { x <+ y <+ z <+ 7 }
     ;; 7
     ;; > (list x y z)
     ;; '(7 7 7)
     ((_ var var1 ... expr) (begin ;; i do not do what the syntax says
(assignation not in the good order) but it gives the same result
                  (define var expr)
                  (define var1 var)
                  ...
                  var))



     ))


(define-syntax ⥆
  (syntax-rules ()

     ((_ var ...) (<+ var ...))))


;; > {(values 2 4 5) +> (x y z) +> (u v w) +> (a b c)}
;; 2
;; 4
;; 5
(define-syntax +>
  (syntax-rules ()

    ((_ exp var ...) (<+ var ... exp))))



;; > {(values 2 4 5) ⥅ (x y z) ⥅ (u v w) ⥅ (a b c)}
;; 2
;; 4
;; 5
;; > (list x y z u v w a b c)
;; '(2 4 5 2 4 5 2 4 5)
(define-syntax ⥅
  (syntax-rules ()

     ((_ expr ...) (+> expr ...))))


(<+ (x y z) (u v w) (a b c)  (values 2 4 5))


(<+ result (list x y z u v w a b c))

(display result) (newline)


(base) mattei@MacBook-Pro-Touch-Bar Scheme-PLUS-for-Kawa % kawa Scheme+.scm
(2 4 5 2 4 5 2 4 5)

but it is  repeating the evaluation of expr

On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 12:01 AM Damien Mattei <damien.mattei@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> this macro seems not valid for kawa but is right with Racket and Guile:
>
>
>
> (define-syntax <+
>   (syntax-rules ()
>
>     ((_ (var1 ...) expr) (begin
>                (define-values (var1 ...) expr)
>                (values var1 ...)))
>     ;; (begin
>     ;;   (define var1 '())
>     ;;   ...
>     ;;   ;;(display "<+ multiple") (newline)
>     ;;   (set!-values (var1 ...) expr)))
>
>     ;; > {(x y z) <+ (u v w) <+ (a b c)  <+ (values 2 4 5)}
>     ;; 2
>     ;; 4
>     ;; 5
>     ;; > (list x y z u v w a b c)
>     ;; '(2 4 5 2 4 5 2 4 5)
>     ((_ (var10 ...) (var11 ...) ... expr) (begin  ;; i do not do what
> the syntax says (assignation not in the good order) but it gives the
> same result
>                         (define-values (var10 ...) expr)
>                         (define-values (var11 ...) (values var10 ...))
>                         ...
>                         (values var10 ...)))
>
>     ((_ var expr) (begin
>             (define var expr)
>             var))
>
>      ;; > { y <+ z <+ 7 }
>      ;; 7
>      ;; > z
>      ;; 7
>      ;; > y
>      ;; 7
>      ;; > { x <+ y <+ z <+ 7 }
>      ;; 7
>      ;; > (list x y z)
>      ;; '(7 7 7)
>      ((_ var var1 ... expr) (begin ;; i do not do what the syntax says
> (assignation not in the good order) but it gives the same result
>                   (define var expr)
>                   (define var1 var)
>                   ...
>                   var))
>
>      ))
>
> error:
>
> ... follows template with no suitably-nested pattern variable
>
> the error is located on the second pattern:
>
> ((_ (var10 ...) (var11 ...) ... expr) (begin  ;; i do not do what the
> syntax says (assignation not in the good order) but it gives the same
> result
>                         (define-values (var10 ...) expr)
>                         (define-values (var11 ...) (values var10 ...))
>                         ...
>                         (values var10 ...)))
>
> i had a few doubt long ago about multiple ... use but it worked well
> with other scheme.
>
> Damien

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-07  7:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-06 22:01 macro error: ... follows template with no suitably-nested pattern variable Damien Mattei
2023-10-07  7:53 ` Damien Mattei

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).