* [Uwe Moeller <umr@interlogic.de>] libc/2215: mcheck(): free() reports "invalid pointer" while pointer looks ok
@ 2001-04-26 0:16 Andreas Jaeger
2001-04-26 6:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2001-04-26 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-alpha; +Cc: Uwe Moeller
We received the appended bug report. Wolfram, can you take a look, please?
Is mcheck together with MALLOC_CHECK_=1 forbidden? Or where is the
problem?
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Uwe Moeller <umr@interlogic.de>] libc/2215: mcheck(): free() reports "invalid pointer" while pointer looks ok
2001-04-26 0:16 [Uwe Moeller <umr@interlogic.de>] libc/2215: mcheck(): free() reports "invalid pointer" while pointer looks ok Andreas Jaeger
@ 2001-04-26 6:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-26 7:20 ` Wolfram Gloger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Drepper @ 2001-04-26 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-alpha; +Cc: Uwe Moeller
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
> We received the appended bug report. Wolfram, can you take a look, please?
>
> Is mcheck together with MALLOC_CHECK_=1 forbidden? Or where is the
> problem?
I've a change for this which I'm testing in this moment. The problem
is that the hooks are overwritten before malloc had the chance to
install it's own wrappers.
--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Uwe Moeller <umr@interlogic.de>] libc/2215: mcheck(): free() reports "invalid pointer" while pointer looks ok
2001-04-26 6:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
@ 2001-04-26 7:20 ` Wolfram Gloger
2001-04-26 17:48 ` Which branch in CVS will become glibc-2.2.3? Steven J. Hill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Gloger @ 2001-04-26 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: drepper; +Cc: libc-alpha, umr
Hello,
> I've a change for this which I'm testing in this moment. The problem
> is that the hooks are overwritten before malloc had the chance to
> install it's own wrappers.
OK thanks -- I think one set of hooks should take precedence, if the
hooks have already been set by mcheck then MALLOC_CHECK_ shouldn't try
to re-set them.
Regards,
Wolfram.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Which branch in CVS will become glibc-2.2.3?
2001-04-26 7:20 ` Wolfram Gloger
@ 2001-04-26 17:48 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-04-26 22:50 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steven J. Hill @ 2001-04-26 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-alpha; +Cc: aj
Greetings.
As I am actively trying to help maintain the toolchain for
Linux/MIPS, I would like to know which branch in the glibc
CVS will become the new 2.2.3 version? My guess is it will
come from one of these 3 branches:
HEAD
MAIN
glibc-2_2_2
MAIN is my first guess and glibc-2_2_2 is my second guess. I
want to be able to actively test what is going to be the next
release. Thanks.
-Steve
--
Steven J. Hill - Embedded SW Engineer
Public Key: ' http://www.cotw.com/pubkey.txt '
FPR1: E124 6E1C AF8E 7802 A815
FPR2: 7D72 829C 3386 4C4A E17D
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Which branch in CVS will become glibc-2.2.3?
2001-04-26 17:48 ` Which branch in CVS will become glibc-2.2.3? Steven J. Hill
@ 2001-04-26 22:50 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2001-04-26 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sjhill; +Cc: libc-alpha
"Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@cotw.com> writes:
> Greetings.
>
> As I am actively trying to help maintain the toolchain for
> Linux/MIPS, I would like to know which branch in the glibc
> CVS will become the new 2.2.3 version? My guess is it will
> come from one of these 3 branches:
We do not work on any branch at the momement.
>
> HEAD
> MAIN
HEAD=MAIN=current development branch
> glibc-2_2_2
That's no branch, that's just a release tag.
>
> MAIN is my first guess and glibc-2_2_2 is my second guess. I
> want to be able to actively test what is going to be the next
> release. Thanks.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-26 22:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-26 0:16 [Uwe Moeller <umr@interlogic.de>] libc/2215: mcheck(): free() reports "invalid pointer" while pointer looks ok Andreas Jaeger
2001-04-26 6:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-26 7:20 ` Wolfram Gloger
2001-04-26 17:48 ` Which branch in CVS will become glibc-2.2.3? Steven J. Hill
2001-04-26 22:50 ` Andreas Jaeger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).