public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: caiyinyu <caiyinyu@loongson.cn>
To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, joseph_myers@mentor.com,
	carlos@redhat.com, i.swmail@xen0n.name
Cc: xuchenghua@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LoongArch: Fix ptr mangling/demangling features.
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:11:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6081b6f9-6fd8-8ffc-6af2-6b46e4df8a38@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c039b59e-b3ca-9da4-7bc4-91af8308ebf7@loongson.cn>




在 2022/8/26 上午10:44, caiyinyu 写道:
>
> How about using this patch[1] now to fix this build error first?
>
> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-August/141489.html
>
> There is no modify in common files and all happy besides performance 
> overhead
>
> of one more instruction.

I also sent a new patch which combined the two patches If community can 
accept it.

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-August/141677.html




>
>
> 在 2022/8/26 上午1:01, Adhemerval Zanella Netto 写道:
>>
>> On 25/08/22 12:27, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 12:08 -0300, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote:
>>>> Does is really pay off the complexity to use 
>>>> HAVE_LOONGARCH_EXPLICIT_RELOCS? The
>>>> PTR_MANGLE is used some specific cases and hardly a hotstop.
>>> LDST_PCREL added as a macro in sysdep.h, so further assembly
>>> implementations might reuse it then it may appear in some hot spot.
>>>
>>> If we quote "optimization too early is the ultimate evil", we can drop
>>> it for now and review once we use LDST_PCREL somewhere else. But to me
>>> this is rather a simple autoconf check and I can't figure out a
>>> situation where it's evil...
>> It is more that configure checks might create maintainability burden 
>> or just
>> dead code in the long term, specially where it does have a fallback 
>> that works
>> with no much performance penalty.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-26  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-23 12:28 [PATCH 0/2] " caiyinyu
2022-08-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] " caiyinyu
2022-08-25 15:08   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-08-25 15:27     ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-08-25 17:01       ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-08-26  2:44         ` caiyinyu
2022-08-26  8:11           ` caiyinyu [this message]
2022-08-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] LoongArch: Add HAVE_LOONGARCH_EXPLICIT_RELOCS in config.h.in caiyinyu
2022-08-25 15:06   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6081b6f9-6fd8-8ffc-6af2-6b46e4df8a38@loongson.cn \
    --to=caiyinyu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=i.swmail@xen0n.name \
    --cc=joseph_myers@mentor.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    --cc=xuchenghua@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).